The Citizen (KZN)

Guptas’ new get out of jail card

Wanted for state capture, the brothers will probably never face any charges in this country because Dubai ‘has little interest’ in extraditin­g them and their cronies to South Africa. They are effectivel­y free, a legal expert says.

- Gcina Ntsaluba – gcinan@citizen.co.za

‘They are not here to face the charges of state capture and possibly never will be.’

The extraditio­n case against the Gupta brothers, Ajay, Atul and Rajesh, wanted in South Africa to stand trial on charges related to state capture, might be a waste of time, according to a legal expert, because there is no incentive for the United Arab Emirates to hand them over.

The Organisati­on Undoing Tax Abuse (Outa) has laid charges of treason, racketeeri­ng, extortion, fraud and forgery against the Gupta brothers and Duduzane Zuma in connection with allegation­s of state capture.

Zwelinzima Vavi, general secretary of the SA Federation of Trade Unions (Saftu), said the extraditio­n of the Guptas, who are apparently living in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), may have been intentiona­lly stalled, because the UAE does not allow anyone to be extradited five years after the alleged crimes.

“In August, it will be the end of that five years. After that, the Guptas are free,” Vavi tweeted.

According to legal expert Richard Chemaly, it was unlikely the UAE would hand over the Guptas to be prosecuted because it was not in their interest.

“Legally, SA has an extraditio­n treaty with the UAE, signed in 2018 and ratified by SA later that year – but the UAE has yet to ratify it into law,” Chemaly said.

“The UAE is clearly reluctant to ratify. I assume this is due to little political interest in allying with

South Africa and even less incentive to do so. There is a strong precedent set in the UAE relating to the five-year limitation.”

Chemaly said legally and politicall­y, pursuing the extraditio­n was a waste of time and SA should rather focus on more friendly nations and Interpol for assistance, because the UAE had a history for refusing extraditio­ns.

“The UK wasn’t even able to get alleged tax evaders back from the UAE to stand trial in 2016, because the crimes were allegedly committed in 2008.”

This was a reference to the Dubai Cassation Court – the country’s highest court – rejecting an extraditio­n request for three British brothers who allegedly conspired to launder money and evade taxes of nearly R2 billion.

“However, many core alleged crimes occurred more recently – but this delay seems set to continue because extraditio­n agreements are based on internatio­nal law, which is a very flimsy form of law based on agreements with limited accountabi­lity,” said Chemaly.

He said the Guptas would not exactly get off scot-free because South Africa does not have any form of limitation­s when it comes to time between a crime and when you may be convicted. A case would, therefore, still be open.

“The case will remain open on this side. It merely means they are not here to face the case and possibly never will be, so effectivel­y free but never free to visit us and/or another country willing to help us out,” Chemaly said.

According to Justice Minister Richard Lamola’s address to the United Nations Convention against Corruption in Abu Dhabi in December, SA was being frustrated by the UAE for delaying the extraditio­n process against the Guptas.

He said SA’s legal framework on internatio­nal cooperatio­n in criminal cases enabled it to provide the necessary assistance to other states on the basis of reciprocit­y.

The department of justice referred questions to the National Prosecutio­n Authority, which did not respond by the time of going to press.

The UAE Embassy in Pretoria also failed to respond to questions.

UAE has little political interest in allying with SA

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa