Cape Argus

River Club developer scores a victory in Supreme Court

- MWANGI GITHAHU mwangi.githahu@inl.co.za

IN A victory for the Liesbeek Leisure Property Trust (LLPT), the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) has dismissed an appeal applicatio­n from the Observator­y Civic Associatio­n (OCA), which is trying to stop constructi­on at the River Club site pending a legal battle over developmen­t approvals.

The site, which is expected to house online retailer Amazon’s African headquarte­rs, has been the subject of several court battles between the OCA, which is a community-based organisati­on, and the LLPT.

The OCA had challenged the Western Cape High Court’s finding that the initial interdict order was granted as a result of incorrect and misleading submission­s at the behest of OCA.

The SCA’s latest order set aside the OCA’s attempt to appeal against last year’s decision of a full bench of the Western Cape High Court, which found their claims that there was exclusion or otherwise inadequate consultati­on by the developers to be false.

In that case the court reversed the decision of the first instance court to grant an interdict and unanimousl­y found that the OCA’s case had entirely failed to meet the requiremen­ts for an interdict against the constructi­on of the River Club developmen­t.

The full bench had also found that there was no risk of harm at all to the heritage of the area, and said that, in fact, the developmen­t might enhance the resource.

The OCA did not try to challenge the substance of the court’s decision, but had attempted to challenge the costs order that was granted against them, including the costs of two counsel of the developer, the City of Cape Town, the Province, and the Western Cape First Nation Collective.

In this latest decision, the SCA has dismissed the OCA’s leave to appeal against the applicatio­n again with a costs order awarded against them on the grounds that the requiremen­ts for special leave to appeal were not satisfied.

The judges ruled the OCA had no reasonable prospect or realistic chance of success on appeal. Contacted for comment on the ruling, OCA spokespers­on Lelie London said: “The OCA is consulting its lawyers at this point. We can’t say anything further right now.”

LLPT’s Trace Venter said they felt vindicated by the SCA order and constructi­on was set to continue.

“Over a period of more than four years, LLPT conducted an all-encompassi­ng and exhaustive environmen­tal, heritage and planning applicatio­n process in full compliance with all applicable statutory requiremen­ts.

“Yet it was dragged to court by the OCA and its associates in a manifestly inappropri­ate strategy to try to stop the developmen­t at all costs.”

Venter said the appeal judgment of the high court made it plain that the OCA had failed to establish even a prima facie case as it found that the OCA “failed at the first hurdle”.

Venter said LLPT saw the SCA order as “another win for the residents of Cape Town who stand to benefit from the numerous benefits the developmen­t will deliver”.

 ?? ?? THE Amazon constructi­on site.
THE Amazon constructi­on site.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa