Cape Argus

150 left homeless after Masiphumel­ele blaze

- Okuhle Hlati

A FIRE that ripped through Masiphumel­ele has left more than 100 people homeless.

On Tuesday, the City of Cape Town responded to a fire in the informal settlement, which destroyed 34 shacks and displaced about 150 residents, said the City’s Fire and Rescue spokespers­on Theo Layne.

“No injuries have been reported, and (a) cause of fire is unknown at this stage,” Layne said.

One of those affected, Sizeka Daleka, 39, said she was at work when her home burnt: “I wish I had not gone to work because maybe I could have saved some things. Now I have lost everything; I am left with the clothes I’m wearing.

“My children and husband said the fire was quick; they couldn’t save anything, and they are also left with the clothes they wore,” Daleka said.

Another resident, Zoliswa Dekeda, said an electrical fault was a suspected cause. “The owner of the house where it started was at work; she came back to nothing but ashes. We lost everything, people opened their homes for us,” Dekeda said, adding residents hoped to finish rebuilding yesterday.

HOME education will only be available to the rich and no longer to everyone in South Africa, should amendments to the home education policy go through.

The Department of Basic Education called for public comment on the Draft Policy on Home Education.

Cape Home Educators chairperso­n Victor Sabbe said that through the new policy, a larger financial burden would be placed on both parents and the government.

He said home-schooling associatio­ns were part of the review process of the home education policy in 2014, but they left the process as they believed the department wanted to “co-parent and we as parents disagreed as it would really mean the state capture of the family”.

Sabbe said there was a massive outcry by parents and said the department had received so many emails that “their server crashed… we were instructed to ask our members to stop sending objections”.

“If the department does not listen to our concerns about the policy parents will just not comply, like what has been happening for the last 20 years. The department would have to spend time and money and would have achieved absolutely nothing. All we are asking is that they listen to us. We are more than willing to work with them to make education great in our country.”

The department said that home education was a “purposeful programme of education for a pupil, alternativ­e to school attendance, which is provided under the direction and supervisio­n of the pupil’s parent primarily in the environmen­t of the pupil’s home.

They said home education was recognised under section 51 of the SA Schools Act, 84 of 1996, as a lawful alternativ­e to compulsory attendance at school. The amendment will substitute section 51 of the act, to provide an applicatio­n process for registrati­on of pupils for home education.

The department noted, in the bill, that home education had a number of benefits, particular­ly for pupils with learning disabiliti­es, profession­al athletes and those who are far away from suitable schools.

“The amendments create clarity in regard to the powers and responsibi­lities of the head of department as well as the responsibi­lities of the parents of the pupil. Currently, the legislatio­n is silent on what is required of parents where they wish to home school pupils in Grades 10 to 12. The amendment makes provision for the parent of a pupil who wishes to continue with home education after completing Grade 9, by making use of the services of a private or independen­t service provider to register for the national senior certificat­e with an independen­t or private assessment body.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa