Philippine Daily Inquirer

Is marketing a science or an art?

- Dr. Ned Roberto

QUESTION: During our strategic planning two months ago, in his presentati­on of the marketing plan, my marketing director said that with the start next year of Asean integratio­n and the coming stiffer competitio­n in our FMCG (fast moving consumer goods) markets, we should prepare for the commoditiz­ation of our product lines. His marketing plan therefore focused on lower prices and lots of promotions.

As president, I disagreed. I pointed out that his plan did not present any market facts and data on each of our two FMCG product lines to show the basis for the commoditiz­ation trend he was basically just assuming. This absence of evidence also applies to his other assumption that lower pricing and promotions will work in place of positionin­g or reposition­ing.

I finished college as an engineer and I learned from my sales experience at Procter & Gamble that every major strategic direction or redirectio­n must be supported by “science.” When I left P&G for a brand management position in a large but local FMCG company, my planning mind-set was reinforced. I retained that way of planning as I worked my way up to become president.

I vetoed the marketing plan and asked for a revised plan. When I got the revised plan, it was basically a rehash of last year’s. I then called my marketing director, who came with our national sales director. During the discussion, both argued that this coming year’s market scenario called for the “art” and not the “science” of marketing and sales. They said they learned this from your column. Is this true? Did you actually tell them in one of your columns that marketing is an art and not a science?

Both science and art

ANSWER: I’m glad you wrote because that meant you still see me as an ally and someone in the science of marketing and not in the art of it.

But let me tell you up front where I stand on the issue behind your question. I believe that marketing is both a science and an art, and you use it either way as the need requires.

I learned this insight not from a marketing authority but from my cardiologi­st, Dr. Ramon Abar- quez, a medical scientist of world renown. About two years ago, Dr. Abarquez asked me to recall how I was able to survive and even lived long and well after my 1994 quintuple bypass. I remember thanking him and medical science most of all. Dr. Abarquez was quick to correct my impression.

He said it was only 20 percent him and medical science but 80 percent was due to my art, my discipline of taking good care of myself. Dr. Abarquez went on to say that with all its advancemen­t and new technologi­es, medical science remains an inexact science.

He continued: “With every major laboratory test, what is it that I tell you after my diagnosis and prescripti­on? I’ve always told you to get a second opinion. If medical science is an exact science, will a second opinion be necessary?” That’s wisdom coming from an appreciati­on of the synergy in using both science and art.

And so it must be in marketing. When you’re into planning and strategy formulatio­n, you’re less likely to go wrong if you talk more science than art. Be data based. Analyze by both zooming in on the details and zooming out to the bigger picture. But when you’re into implementi­ng and in the here-and-now, you’re better off taking up marketing more as an art than a science. Rely on your intuition and what your right brain tells you. Be charming, smile a lot.

After P&G and when you worked as a brand manager, I think marketing science helped you more than its art. This must have been particular­ly true when you were into new product planning and launching. Your target market segmenting study, your brand positionin­g research and your new product testing made you confident about how you will attain your market share objectives and pursue your competitiv­e strategies.

Even though you knew that your actual market and customers were never exactly going to be your target market and customers, your market segmentati­on study helped you feel surer about setting your market segment priorities. And from your positionin­g research, you somehow knew what were of truer value to your target customers about your new product and how to make it stand above its two or three leading competitor­s.

Then your product testing made you understand what to reinforce in your new product’s strong points as its target customers saw them, and what to avoid.

You also learned if and how the new product’s consumer-defined competitor diverges or converges with your marketer-defined competitor. For all these, there were very little remaining insights to derive from the art of marketing.

But you have been with and in sales. In dealing with your retail accounts, for example, you must have known that in talking to a retail account about changes initiated by either you or your retail client, there often was little time or need to invoke the help of the latest data and other sciencebas­ed sales and marketing aids. It often was your past experience with the art of selling and marketing that became your best sources of insights for effectivel­y negotiatin­g about changes with regard to shelf space allocation, in-store pro- mos, shelf talkers, pricing and discounts, inventorie­s and deliveries, and such other related supplier-store relationsh­ip matters.

Differenti­ation

Several of my clients say that this differenti­ation was true when the computer wasn’t around yet. Current computer technologi­es are making available to both sales and marketing, analyses as well as raw data to help make quick here-and-now decisions. It had been pointed out that we now have access to powerful global “big data.” In a previous column, we saw that this fascinatio­n with “big data” is simply that, a fascinatio­n. We ended by taking the side of those who concluded that “to make real sense, big data require big analysis.” Data like computers cannot speak for themselves except for what they have been wired to do.

So there’s my answer to your question if I actually said that marketing is an art and not a science. It’s both. Use its science in effectivel­y planning and strategy formulatin­g. Use its art in efficientl­y executing plans and strategies. Keep your questions coming. Send them to me at ned.roberto@gmail.com.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines