The Press

Industry tackling excess use of sugar, fat and salt

- KATHERINE RICH

Claims by academics and medics in the article ‘The Politics of Obesity’ (August 27) that not much has changed in the past 15 years to solve obesity or improve health overlooks significan­t progress and fails to give credit for work being done.

While that article presented many opinions from those who believe not enough is being done in the right places on this issue, it contained just a very short response from the other side of the argument. The main industry representa­tive, the NZ Food and Grocery Council, believes a great deal has been done.

In the past 15 years there have been big changes within the food industry, by the Government, and in the advertisin­g environmen­t. Marketers now abide by detailed advertisin­g codes which are overseen by the Advertisin­g Standards Authority. There are codes for advertisin­g food, alcohol and advertisin­g food to children. All the codes state that advertisin­g must not encourage excess consumptio­n. Advertisin­g to children must not undermine parents or compromise healthy choices. Many people who read them remark on how detailed the codes are. The industry works hard to adhere to these rules. Many companies, such as Nestle, CocaCola and Mars, go further and have policies of not advertisin­g to children at all.On television, a lot has changed in the past 15 years. There is now no advertisin­g during pre-school television programmes and the amount of food advertisin­g during school-age programmin­g has reduced dramatical­ly to insignific­ant levels.

There have been massive changes to food products and how they are sold. Walk into a supermarke­t today and space dedicated for fresh produce has increased. Thousands of products have been developed or reformulat­ed to reduce salt, fat or sugar. Soda is a prime example. Fifteen years ago there were limited options for zero or low sugar. Now there are zero-sugar options for all major brands.

What food companies are doing in the community has changed. There are many examples of companies funding nutrition and cooking education, breakfast programmes, and physical activity projects. Two years ago our industry raised $250,000 to go towards an obesity prevention project, and the Warehouse Group has just raised a phenomenal $765,000 that will all go towards teaching children about nutrition. Companies such as Nestle and Sanitarium have funded programmes such as Be Healthy, Be Active, and the Kids Tryathlon. Sanitarium also launched a free nutrition service for all New Zealanders, while Coca-Cola’s Move60 programme has focused on getting more Kiwis active. There are many others.

The school environmen­t has changed significan­tly. Companies have been part of the Heart Foundation’s Fuelled4Li­fe programme and many have redevelope­d their products to make them healthier. Most schools today are water and milk only. Coca-Cola and Frucor, through the voluntary schools agreement with the Government, have not been selling sugary drinks to schools for years. These are all significan­t changes.

The concern about children and adults consuming excess sugar, fat and salt, and too many calories overall is now on the agenda of all New Zealand Food and Grocery Council member companies.

Many have embraced the Government’s new Health Star Rating system for packaged foods. The number of products carrying the new Star labels grows, and a smartphone app is now available so people can see rankings for all products. This entire system for Australia and New Zealand is new and it is progress.

There has also been another change in the past couple of decades. While sugar is the focus today, 20 years ago it was all about high-fat/high-risk, low-fat/lowrisk, with hardly a mention of sugar – because sugar was thought to play little part in obesity or heart disease. Any link between soda and obesity was seen as mere speculatio­n, and even sugar labelling was seen as counter-productive in determinin­g what foods people should consumer. Clearly, views have changed as the campaign is now for sugar taxes and teaspoon labelling, but there’s never been any explanatio­n as to when or why the change in tack occurred.

Soda taxes have not worked anywhere in the world to reduce obesity or the consumptio­n of too many calories. In Mexico, the 10 per cent tax has generated billions of pesos, and after a slight decline initially, sales are now back to pre-tax levels. These are independen­t Nielsen figures and are beyond reproach.

It’s a shame that those campaignin­g for taxation and regulation seem to have parked advice regarding energy balance (still a fundamenta­l basis on nutrition theory) and the importance of physical activity. Focusing on food is only one part of a very complex equation. FGC is an industry associatio­n and a voice for grocery-makers. We regularly make evidence-based submission­s on government consultati­ons and bills which we publish on our website. We also participat­e in public discussion about issues facing our industry and New Zealand. This is not the ‘politics of obesity’, it’s just democracy in action.

* Katherine Rich is the chief executive of the New Zealand Food and Grocery Council.

There are many examples of food companies funding nutrition and cooking education, breakfast programmes, and physical activity projects.

 ??  ?? The food industry argues it is tackling obesity head on. Fifteen years ago there were limited options for zero or low sugar. Now there are zero-sugar options for all major brands.
The food industry argues it is tackling obesity head on. Fifteen years ago there were limited options for zero or low sugar. Now there are zero-sugar options for all major brands.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand