Friend: Another side to judge
Yale colleague ‘troubled’ by Kavanaugh’s ‘mischaracterisation’
FBI agents have interviewed one of the three women who have accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct while a former Yale colleague says the judge wasn’t truthful in his testimony on Friday.
Meanwhile, Republicans and Democrats have quarrelled over whether the bureau has enough time and freedom to conduct a thorough investigation before a high-stakes vote on his nomination to the United States’ highest court.
The White House insisted it was not “micromanaging” the new oneweek review of Kavanaugh’s background but some Democratic lawmakers claimed the White House was keeping investigators from interviewing certain witnesses. President Donald Trump, for his part, tweeted that no matter how much time and discretion the FBI was given, “it will never be enough” for Democrats trying to keep Kavanaugh off the bench.
And even as the FBI explored the past allegations that have surfaced against Kavanaugh, another Yale classmate came forward to accuse the federal appellate judge of being untruthful in his testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee about the extent of his drinking in college.
In speaking to FBI agents, Deborah Ramirez detailed her allegation that Kavanaugh exposed himself to her at a party in the early 1980s when they were students at Yale University, according to a person familiar with the matter who was not authorised to publicly discuss details of a confidential investigation. Kavanaugh has denied Ramirez’s allegation.
The person familiar with Ramirez’s questioning, who spoke to the Associated Press on condition of anonymity, said she also provided investigators with the names of others who she said could corroborate her account.
But Christine Blasey Ford, a California professor who says Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her when they were teenagers, had not been contacted by the FBI since Trump on Saturday ordered the agency to take another look at the nominee’s background. Kavanaugh has denied assaulting Ford.
In a statement released yesterday, a Yale classmate of Kavanaugh’s said he is “deeply troubled by what has been a blatant mischaracterisation by Brett himself of his drinking at Yale”. Charles “Chad” Ludington, who now teaches at North Carolina State University, said he was a friend of Kavanaugh’s at Yale and that Kavanaugh was “a frequent drinker, and a heavy drinker”. “On many occasions I heard Brett slur his words and saw him staggering from alcohol consumption, not all of which was beer. When Brett got drunk, he was often belligerent and aggressive,” Ludington said.
While saying that youthful drinking should not condemn a person for life, Ludington said he was concerned about Kavanaugh’s statements under oath before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Speaking to the issue of the scope of the FBI’s investigation, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said White House counsel Don McGahn, who is managing Kavanaugh’s nomination, “has allowed the Senate to dictate what these terms look like, and what the scope of the investigation is”. “The White House isn’t intervening. We’re not micromanaging this process. It’s a Senate process,” Sanders said.
White House counsellor Kellyanne Conway said the investigation would be “limited in scope” and “will not be a fishing expedition. The FBI is not tasked to do that”.
Senate Judiciary Committee member Republican Jeff Flake requested an investigation on Saturday — after he and other Republicans on the panel voted along strict party lines in favour of Kavanaugh’s confirmation — as a condition for his own subsequent vote to put Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court.
Another committee member, Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, said yesterday that testimony would be taken from Ramirez and Kavanaugh’s high school friend Mark Judge, who has been named by two of three women accusing Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct.
“I think that will be the scope of it. And that should be the scope of it,” Graham said.
Dianne Feinstein, the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, called on the White House and the FBI to provide the written directive regarding the investigation’s scope. In a letter yesterday, she also asked for updates on any expansion of the original directive.
Trump initially opposed such an investigation as allegations began mounting but relented and ordered one on Saturday. He later said the FBI has “free rein”. “They’re going to do whatever they have to do, whatever it is they do. They’ll be doing things that we have never even thought of,” Trump said on Sunday. “And hopefully at the conclusion everything will be fine.”
The third woman, Julie Swetnick, accused Kavanaugh and Judge of excessive drinking and inappropriate treatment of women in the early 1980s, among other accusations. Kavanaugh has called her accusations a “joke”. Judge has said he “categorically” denies the allegations.
Swetnick’s lawyer, Michael Avenatti, said Saturday that his client had not been contacted by the FBI but was willing to co-operate with investigators.