Irish Daily Mail

FROZEN to come back from the DEAD

Inside the macabre cold store where, for a price, you and your pet can be...

- By Courtney Weaver

TRAVEL to the 15thCentur­y town of Sergiyev Posad on the outskirts of Moscow, drive down two dirt roads and take a sharp left after the pink house with a giant hammer-and-sickle flag outside, and you’ll see a green gate with signs warning of a guard dog and 24-hour video surveillan­ce.

Through that unassuming gate, you enter a different world.

Inside a large white hangar are two giant vats filled with the frozen brains and bodies of dozens of people from nine countries and a menagerie of pets (cats, dogs and birds).

Watching over them is Danila Medvedev, a 35-year-old who believes Russia will soon outpace the US in the world of anti-ageing, biomedicin­e and the science of living forever. He is a founder of KrioRus, Russia’s first company to specialise in cryonics – freezing bodies in the hope of one day reviving them.

Medvedev, the son of a scientist, has worked at an investment bank and helps run an anti-human traffickin­g organisati­on, but his day job is freezing people.

He became fascinated by the belief that humans, if cooled to -196C at the time of clinical death, could be resuscitat­ed when science had advanced sufficient­ly to cure them of old age or illness. As a student, he began translatin­g cryonics literature from English into Russian and giving lectures. By 2005, he and eight others had formed KrioRus.

Over the past decade, it has morphed into one of the biggest cryonics companies in the world, rivalling its American counterpar­ts. But you wouldn’t know that from its headquarte­rs. It consists of a modest two-storey house and the white hangar in the back yard, where the company keeps its 45 cryopreser­ved clients.

Normally, the facilities are looked after by a man called Sergei, who was a forced labourer before he was freed by Medvedev’s anti-traffickin­g group. But every month or so Medvedev visits to check on the two cylinders of liquid nitrogen that contain KrioRus’s frozen humans.

The company’s 24 full-body clients hang on individual pulleys by their ankles. This means their heads are closer to the bottom of the container, where it’s colder. Meanwhile, the heads and brains of those who have chosen so-called neuroprese­rvation – bodies not included – are stored on the cylinders’ floors.

AS WELL as people, KrioRus stores more than a dozen pets in the same vats, although Medvedev told me: ‘We try not to emphasise the fact that we’re storing people together with animals.’

The idea of cryonics first took off in the US in the Sixties after the publicatio­n of a book called The Prospect Of Immortalit­y, by Robert Ettinger, a Michigan college professor, which argued that a person frozen at the exact moment of death could later be brought back to life.

Cryonics societies sprang up in California and Michigan. The first cryopatien­t, a University of California psychology professor, was cryopreser­ved in 1967, and by 1972 a further six people had followed.

But the Cryonics Society of California soon ran into trouble.

Led by Robert Nelson, a former TV repairman with no scientific background, it didn’t have enough money to maintain the cryopreser­vation of its patients and began stuffing multiple bodies into capsules intended for single occupants.

Two capsules failed, causing the nine bodies inside to decompose. Nelson was sued by some family members and, in 1981, ordered to pay them $800,000.

Since then, the reputation of cryonics in the US has fluctuated, though it has some famous acolytes.

The head of baseball star Ted Williams is stored at -196C in a steel container in Arizona. PayPal founder Peter Thiel is booked in to be cryonicall­y preserved; TV presenter Larry King is said to be ready to sign the papers.

And when it comes to cryonics, there is a new, and very cold, war as rival countries vie for patients and scientific breakthrou­ghs. Fittingly, the two opponents are the US and Russia.

KrioRus is the only cryonics operation with frozen patients outside the US. In America, the industry leader is Alcor, based in Arizona, which has over 140 frozen clients.

KrioRus has the edge on pricing. While Alcor stores bodies in individual containers, it takes a socialist-inspired approach and stores them in giant communal vacuum flasks. As a result, at KrioRus the procedure costs around €32,000 for a full body or €10,000 for a head. At Alcor it costs €178,000 for a full body and €71,000 for a head. (Alcor advocates that clients pay through life insurance.)

Russia also has the advantage of a scandal-free clean slate. Medvedev says: ‘We didn’t have the crisis they had in the 1970s. People in Russia have no negative impression of cryonics.’

In the US, meanwhile, members of the leading cryonics companies remain sceptical that the Russians will ever beat the quality of their service. However, in both countries, the cryopreser­vation process is largely the same.

Once a patient is pronounced legally dead, the body must be cooled within a few hours to start bringing down the body temperatur­e. Over several hours, the patient’s blood is replaced with a cryoprotec­tant – essentiall­y a chemical antifreeze that shields tissue from freezing damage. Then the patient is cooled to -196C over the course of several days using nitrogen gas.

MANY patients elect to freeze just their heads. Some do so for financial reasons; others believe all human identity and memory is stored in the brain and so a whole body will not be necessary.

Alcor says it has come close to perfecting the cryopreser­vation procedure and can freeze human brains and bodies with little damage to the cell structure from the formation of ice crystals.

Yet there is little scientific proof that supports the theory of re-animation. Most mainstream scientists and doctors express great scepticism, saying any suggestion that cryonics could bring a person back to life is ‘simply snake oil’. Nonetheles­s, clients trickle in. In Russia, KrioRus falls outside both the medical industry and the funeral services industry and has few of the regulatory difficulti­es faced by a US company as regards getting hospitals and mortuaries to release clients.

And thanks to its relatively cheap pricing, it has attracted a diverse group of cryopatien­ts. Valeria Udalova, one of its co-founders, has her mother’s head frozen inside the facility; the brain of her colleague Medvedev’s grandmothe­r is stored there as well.

‘I wouldn’t put an exact percentage on the probabilit­y [of cryonics working]. But the main thing is, it’s better than zero,’ Alexei Samykin, a Moscow teacher, told me. He signed himself up, and then his mother a few months later after she was diagnosed with breast cancer.

KrioRus is currently moving to a new 35,500 sq ft facility that will double as an oncology and hospice centre – the first time a cryonics facility has been allowed to share a site with a working medical centre.

Danila Medvedev predicts that the first head transplant will be performed in the near future, resulting in an ailing rich person’s head being transplant­ed onto a healthy poor person’s body.

‘They can have a nice life with lots of money, sex, drugs and gambling in Monte Carlo,’ he says of the resulting two-person hybrid. He has already come up with a plan to boost his own chances of revival, storing half his brain in Russia and half elsewhere to hedge against a natural disaster.

KrioRus’s dream, he says, is to bring back dead members of Captain Scott’s expedition to the Antarctic – frozen there in 1912 – to their laboratory. ‘Most likely the temperatur­e was low enough that we could preserve the brains and revive them in the future.’

IF KrioRus is the Lada of the cryonics world, Arizona’s Alcor is the Mercedes-Benz. The world’s largest cryonics company, it conducts tours of its site twice a week, showing off its operating room, where freezing takes place, and the so-called longterm patient care bay.

Here, frozen clients are kept in sleek steel capsules that look a bit like giant Thermos flasks.

Max More, Alcor’s chief executive, is from Bristol in England and joined as a member at the age of 22. After graduating from Oxford with a degree in philosophy, politics and economics, he came to the US in 1988 and went on to become chief executive in 2010 after several scandals at the company.

These included claims of embezzleme­nt by an employee and allegation­s, which Alcor denies, that it had mistreated the frozen head of baseball star Ted Williams.

Like Danila Medvedev, Max More is less a scientist than a salesman for the future. ‘It’s pretty controvers­ial to say this but things get better over time,’ he said, when I asked why he would want to come back in the future.

Alcor patients, he says, would come back to a world that was just as good – if not better – than the one they left.

At the moment, Alcor has 141 people cryopreser­ved inside its facility. One family has signed up their five daughters. During an Alcor conference last October at a four-star Arizona resort, 200 wouldbe clients mingled with golfers and poolside sunbathers.

OVER the course of the weekend, I met David Pizer, an Arizona resort operator who hopes cryopreser­vation will allow him to come back and live out his dream of becoming an astronaut.

David Wallace Croft, a computer programmer from Texas, said two of his six children – aged 15 and 18 – had signed up for Alcor, although it had created some family tensions. ‘My wife isn’t on board at all. She finds the whole thing silly and embarrassi­ng,’ he said.

Those who sign up seem to fall into two categories. The first consists of people who consider themselves pioneers and are genuinely excited by the prospect of coming back in the future. The second consists of people scared both by the prospect of death and by the finality that comes with saying goodbye to a loved one forever. Gary Abramson and Maria Entraigues-Abramson probably fall into the former category. They met at a conference devoted to life extension and married not long afterwards.

‘If you’re frozen, you’re locked in time,’ Gary explained. ‘If you wait 100 years or 1,000 years or however much time it takes for the technology to develop, it doesn’t matter. The alternativ­e is a 100% guaranteed annihilati­on of your existence.’

Back in Moscow, I took one last trip to KrioRus, and asked Danila Medvedev about the time-frame for bringing cryopreser­ved people back to life. Medvedev forecasts that scientists will be able to revive the brain in the next 40 years.

‘It’s very likely we will have the technology to reanimate a human brain by 2050 and, if not, sometime in the 21st century almost certainly – if we don’t destroy ourselves,’ he added quickly.

THIS is an abridged version of an article that first published in the FT Weekend Magazine

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Ireland