‘Delete user data until Sept 25’

THE EDITORIAL ‘Horse sense’ stated that ‘13 prime ministers’ before Narendra Modi resided in 7 Race Course Road. The figure is inaccurate. Rajiv Gandhi was the first Prime Minister to live there in 1984 and it has been the official residence of the Prime Minister since the tenure of his successor, V P Singh.

The error is regretted. student Karmanya Singh Sareen and Amity Law College student Shreya Sethi had moved the high court in the Pil,contending that Whatsapp’s policy “severely compromises the rights of its users and makes the privacy rights of users completely vulnerable.”

Whatsapp had in August announced changes in its privacy policy following its acquisition by Facebook. The new policy has said that account information of users would be shared with Facebook after September 25.

“If users opt for deleting the Whatsapp account before 25/09/2016 the information/data/details of such users should be deleted completely from Whatsapp servers and the same shall not be shared with Facebook or any group companies,” directed the bench, adding that “as far as users who opt to remain in Whatsapp are concerned, the existing information/data/details of such users upto 25/09/2016 shall not be shared with Facebook or any one of its group companies.”

The new policy gives users the option to “opt out” of sharing information with Facebook “for marketing purposes” but says that “undelivered messages” will be retained for 30 days and “media messages” where a large number of people may be sharing a “popular picture or video” could be retained for a longer period.

Observing that there is currently no regulatory framework for Internet based Messaging services such as Whatsapp, the Delhi High court directed the Central government and Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) to “consider the issues regarding functioning if internet messaging applications like Whatsapp and take a decision at the earliest as to whether it is feasible to bring the same under statutory regulatory framework.”

The court, however, declined to pass orders to block the change in privacy policy on the grounds that the issue cannot be taken up by the High court as the messaging service was not violating any rules or laws.

The 15-page judgment has taken note of the privacy policy submitted by Whatsapp. “Users cannot contend that the company shall be compelled to continue with the same terms of service,” observed the bench.

The court said that while the issue relating to existence of the Right to Privacy as an actionable right was still pending before the Supreme Court, the privacy policy submitted by Whatsapp has made it clear that all information relating to a user would be deleted if the user chooses to delete their whatsapp Account at any time.

The Central government, through standing counsel Kirtiman Singh, told the courtthatinternetmessagingapplications had “not yet been brought within the purview of statutory regulatory framework” and the process of creating such a framework had started in March 2015.

Senior advocate Pratibha M Singh, who represented the two petitioners in the PIL, said that the “path breaking order” upholds privacy.