Madras HC orders retransfer of Senthilbalaji’s case from special court to Sessions Court

The moneylaundering case registered by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) against Minister V. Senthilbalaji took another interesting turn on Monday, with the Madras High Court ruling against the recent transfer of the case from the Principal Sessions Court to a special court for MP/MLA cases on the basis of a 2019 State Government Order.

A Division Bench of Justices R. Suresh Kumar and K. Kumaresh Babu ordered the retransfer of the case from the special court to the Principal Sessions Court, which had been designated by the Centre, in consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court in 2016, to hear all cases filed under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002.

The orders were passed on a petition filed by the Minister seeking a clarification as to whether his bail petition should be heard by the Principal Sessions Court or the special court

V. Senthilbalaji

for cases legislators.

Senior Counsel N.R. Elango told the Bench that the Sessions Court had transferred the case bundle to the special court last month for trial.

Thereafter, the special court refused to entertain the Minister’s bail petition citing Section 43(1) of the PMLA, under which only the Centre, and not the State government, was empowered to designate the court empowered to hear PMLA cases. The Sessions Court, too, returned the bail petition on the ground that the case had already been transferred to the special court.

After perusing the 2019 G.O., which requires the transfer of all cases against

against legislators to special courts, the Division Bench said the G.O. could not override Section 43(1), a statutory provision under which only the Centre was empowered to designate a court, in consultation with the Chief Justice, to hear PMLA cases. The Centre had done so in 2016.

Unlike the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, under which both the Centre and the State government were empowered to designate the courts for hearing cases filed under that legislation, the PMLA does not authorise the State governments to designate a court and, therefore, the 2019 G.O. could not be relied upon for the transfer, the Bench held.

It also clarified that the bail petition moved by the Minister without portfolio would also have to be heard only by the Principal Sessions Court.

The orders were passed after hearing N. Ramesh, Special Public Prosecutor for ED, on the legal issue of which court was empowered to hear the moneylaundering case.