Russia’s invasion impaired scientists’ ability to collect climate data

Scientists collecting data in the Arctic already face an uphill battle, with the unforgiving weather and scavenging polar bears. The bears sometimes accidentally destroy instruments. The lack of data because of the confilict is an additional, and exacerba

uman activities have caused the earth to slowly heat up, and now it looks like war – another very human phenomenon – is preventing scientists from accurately measuring how rapidly our climate is changing.

Global temperatures are rising, but temperatures in the Arctic region are rising even faster. Studies suggest a grim reality: that the Arctic is warming nearly fourtimes faster than the rest of the world. The consequences of this go way beyond just the Arctic. The melting permafrost and rising sealevels can have devastating effects on local ecosystems as well as the climate.

HCollaborations have collapsed

Many research stations in the Arctic are part of the International Network for Terrestrial Research and Monitoring in the Arctic (INTERACT). They continuously monitor environmental conditions in the different countries in the region. One country that makes up almost half of it is Russia, but since it invaded Ukraine, foreign scientists haven’t had access to data from Russian field stations. Global collaborations with Russia have collapsed since the invasion, and scientists from outside Russia who were earlier able to travel to field sites in the country to collect data can’t do so anymore. Climate projects that run on European funding also don’t allow them to officially collaborate with Russian partners for now.

“We have to deal with this invisible wall, where there is no flow of data from the Russian side to our side. It is kind of like a blind spot,” said Efrén LópezBlanco, an Arctic researcher at Aarhus University in Denmark. “And I want to believe that it is a temporary blind spot.”

Dr. LópezBlanco and his colleagues recently reported that excluding data from Russia has heavily biased climate data. “When there is an increase in bias, there is a decrease in our ability to either describe or track Arctic changes,” he said.

A hidden difference

The researchers used multiple earthsystem models (ESMs) to understand ecosystem conditions across the Arctic region. They focused on eight “essential variables” of the Arctic ecosystem, including temperature, vegetation, precipitation, and snow depth. ESMs are fully coupled climate, land, and ocean computational models that can be used to generate data for the entire planet. Those used in the study