The Hindu (Hyderabad)

‘Power purchase from Chhattisga­rh crippled nances of power utilities’

The State incurred huge additional expenditur­e under various heads making per unit cost much higher, say senior o cials; power supply was made available from Chhattisga­rh towards 2017-end

- M. Rajeev

The State government has expressed concern that the power purchases made by the previous Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) government from Chhattisga­rh have crippled the power utilities nancially notwithsta­nding claims of BRS president and former chief minister K. Chandrasek­har Rao that power was purchased at ₹3.9 a unit.

Senior o‡cials claimed that during the BRS regime, the State purchased 17,996 million units of power from Chhattisga­rh and made payment of ₹7,719 crore. Coupled with this were the dues to the tune of ₹1,081 crore and another ₹1,362 crore on account of transmissi­on and line charges. This was tantamount to purchasing power at ₹5.64 a unit and the State had to bear an additional cost of ₹3,110 crore despite the claims of the previous government.

The cost estimate was made at a time when the dispute over the pending

Telangana incurred additional expenses on account of transmissi­on and line charges, which raise the cost of power to ₹5.64 a unit.

dues with Chhattisga­rh remained unresolved as Telangana had estimated the dues to be ₹1,081 crore while the power utilities of the neighbouri­ng State peg them at ₹1,715 crore. The Chhattisga­rh government went ahead and complained to the electricit­y appellate tribunal about the pending dues from Telangana.

K. Chandrasek­har Rao with K.R. Suresh Reddy on Monday.

It may be recalled that power supply was made available from Chhattisga­rh towards 2017-end and it had been insu‡cient in meeting the demand. With the supply not not crossing 1,000 MW at any point of time and not satisfacto­ry, the Telangana distributi­on companies had to depend on purchases from open market resulting in additional expenditur­e of ₹2,083 crore between 2017 and 2022.

This was in addition to the cost incurred on account of booking corridor su‡cient to supply 1,000 MW from Chhattisga­rh with the PowerGrid Corporatio­n of India Limited. The agreement ensured that the State had to pay the amount for the corridor irrespecti­ve of whether it had transferre­d power or not. The additional cost on this account were to the tune of ₹638 crore.

The previous government, according to o‡cials, had incurred more charges by booking corridor for supply of another 1,000 MW, which was cancelled midway after ascertaini­ng the power supply position from Chhattisga­rh. As a result, the PGCIL had served notices to the Telangana Discoms seeking payment of ₹261 crore dues on this count as the previous government had signed the agreement without weighing the pros and cons.

Further, it was being pointed out that the Telangana Electricit­y Regulatory Commission had not given its go-ahead for the purchase of power from Chhattisga­rh, which in turn resulted in the demand to classify the payments made by the previous government to Chhattisga­rh as “irregular”.

With the supply not not crossing 1,000 MW at any point of time and not satisfacto­ry, the Telangana distributi­on companies had to depend on purchases from open market

 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India