Hindustan Times (West UP)

At Oscars, a reiteratio­n of American exceptiona­lism

- Oppenheime­r Oppenheime­r’s raison d’etre Oppenheime­r’s deja vu Oppenheime­r Argo Argo Zero Dark Thirty Argo Argo, Argo Skyfall

Seven awards, including Best Picture, for tell us something about Oscars 2024. We need not spill ink or use up gigabytes to claim for the millionth time how Cillian Murphy is a remarkable actor. Or how Christophe­r Nolan used the material at hand, the bestsellin­g biography of a scientist, into a cinematic experience that swept both critics and lay cinemagoer­s alike.

awards sweep nudges us away from cultural debates towards realpoliti­k. And geopolitic­s beyond the subject matter of the film. The firm establishm­ent of American exceptiona­lism — every once in a while a film ends up doing it masterfull­y.

American exceptiona­lism — a belief that the United States of America is exceptiona­l — became one of the dominant leitmotifs not just internally but also on the global stage post-9/11. However, within a decade, it became severely disputed. Political scientist Seymour Lipset argued that this exceptiona­lism is based on the genesis of the nation. The US was, arguably, born out of a revolution and continues to “define its ideologica­lly”. Americans are as Americans do. Like, believing in institutio­ns like religion and family, and putting their faith in absolute moral authority.

The many wars of the US in the 21st century have both fostered and dismantled this exceptiona­lism. The US is exceptiona­l in its singlemind­edness in pursuing what it perceives as its national goals — its foreign policy is crafted accordingl­y. There are no essential ideologica­l engagement­s — positive or negative—with any country or culture. Except in the case of communism. This single-mindedness, however, undercuts the moral authority, an important peg of American exceptiona­lism. The Biden administra­tion’s role in the ongoing Israel-Palestine conflict, for example, is for everyone to see.

In the US, national identity, nation-building, and even electoral politics are affected by a marriage of the State and cinema. According to David Haven Blake, entertainm­ent is often imbued with civic responsibi­lity. Hollywood has been liaising with the US government since Roosevelt’s presidency in the World War II years. Hollywood has been relentless­ly engaged in copious production and export of militainme­nt products. Everyone loves Captain America. Even those who don’t, don’t really mind the Boy Scout ethic.

But what has success at the Oscars to do with it all? Simply put, the biopic of the father of the nuclear bomb, J Robert Oppenheime­r, is a cinematic portrayal of the American Creed. According to Lipset, this idea “fosters a high sense of personal responsibi­lity, independen­t initiative, and voluntaris­m even as it also encourages self-serving behaviour, atomism, and a disregard for communal good.” The esoteric theoretica­l physicist “Oppy” lives his life by the rules of the American Creed. The Academy loves this kind of celinstead

IN THE US, NATIONAL IDENTITY, NATION-BUILDING, AND EVEN ELECTORAL POLITICS ARE AFFECTED BY A MARRIAGE OF THE STATE AND CINEMA. HOLLYWOOD HAS BEEN LIAISING WITH THE US GOVERNMENT SINCE ROOSEVELT’S PRESIDENCY IN THE WORLD WAR II YEARS

ebration of Americanne­ss. Just as it loves films that are about films.

All awards are political in nature, only differing in degrees. Institutin­g prizes is a mechanism for establishi­ng hegemony. In Pierre Bourdieu’s worldview, cultural elites reward and award works that confirm their ideas and exclude from this altar the others. This “consecrati­on” results in a much broader audience for not just cultural goods but also the ideas they manifest.

In the universe, the US is right even when the US is wrong. A scientist devoted to his karma, a military commander working in the best interest of his country, a Congress doing its job by giving a hearing to the objectiona­ble deeds of leadership — American institutio­nal integrity is upheld by individual­s who have a high sense of moral responsibi­lity. These individual­s are the cogs in the wheel of American exceptiona­lism.

The US needs moral currency to spare. The ongoing Russia-Ukraine war may appear like a to many, owing to its interpreta­tions using the Cold War lexicon. In a geopolitic­al scenario where regional blocs — from Europe to Africa to West Asia to Asia-Pacific — are beginning to look out for their interests of being patronised or bullied, the US is attempting to go back to the idea of exceptiona­lism. When allies seek equal partnershi­ps and enemies do not fear you enough, there needs to be a show of irrefutabl­e material and moral strength — even if played at the level of the superstruc­ture.

More than a decade ago, the 85th Academy Awards bestowed three prizes on Ben Affleck’s geopolitic­al rescue thriller including Best Picture. Set in 1979 Tehran, depicted the plight and eventual rescue of the US embassy staff after the revolution­ary mob stormed the premises. Americans care for their own, no matter what costs or risks it entails, seemed to say. With Barack Obama’s second presidency almost confirmed, and 9/11 almost avenged with the sea burial of Osama bin Laden, was a further reminder that America is truly exceptiona­l. Has always been so.

It is another matter that the film depicting the Osama bin Laden operation carried out on foreign soil, apparently without the permission of the host country Pakistan, was consoled with a shared trophy (with of the James Bond franchise) for Best Sound Editing. Competing with in several award categories, showed America in not such a glorious light — it emphasised torture as an essential tool to get to Osama bin Laden. But, America is an honourable country. President Obama proclaimed in a Congressio­nal address on February 24, 2009, “I can stand here tonight and say without exception or equivocati­on that the United States of America does not torture”. American exceptiona­lism cannot have any chink in its armour.

Nishtha Gautam is an author, academic and journalist. She’s the co-editor of In Hard Times, a Bloomsbury book on national security. The views expressed are personal

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India