Hindustan Times (Noida)

Govt may take final call on relief for Adani from public hearing

- Jayashree Nandi letters@hindustant­imes.com ■

NEWDELHI: The exemption given to the Adani-developed Mundra SEZ by the Expert Appraisal Committee may or may not be accepted by the environmen­t ministry, a senior official said.

The environmen­t ministry takes the final call on recommenda­tions by the expert appraisal committee (EAC) on terms of reference (TOR) and clearance issued or declined to any project, the senior environmen­t ministry official said, responding to the panel’s decision to exempt Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone Limited in Mundra, Gujarat, from conducting a public hearing on its proposed expansion.

“All EAC decisions are recommenda­tions which come to us. We can choose to accept or reject it. The decision on exempting the Mundra SEZ from public hearing will also come to us. We will take a decision based on what EAC had observed earlier,” the official added, requesting anonymity.

At a meeting held on January 28, the EAC on infrastruc­ture and coastal regulation zone (CRZ) projects, decided that the expansion project will not be required to conduct a public hearing because the environmen­t impact-assessment notificati­on 2006 and subsequent amendments to it say that all projects and activities located within industrial estates or parks which are approved by the authoritie­s are exempt from one.

“The project proponent applies online, the applicatio­n is then put before the expert appraisal committee which has expert members; the chairman is also an expert member. There are no government members. After the EAC makes a recommenda­tion, the environmen­t ministry examines it. There are three or four options after that --the recommenda­tions are accepted, they can be referred back to the EAC, or rejected; they are sent to the environmen­t minister, who takes a call,” the environmen­t ministry official cited above said.

But the terms of reference (TOF) for the expansion of the project issued by environmen­t ministry on May 17, 2019, accessed by Hindustan Times from the ministry’s Parivesh

THE MUNDRA PORT WATERFRONT PROJECT WAS SEEKING AN EXEMPTION FROM CONDUCTING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITS EXPANSION

website, suggests that EAC directed Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone Limited to actually conduct a public hearing for expansion. “Public hearing to be conducted and issues raised and commitment­s made by the project proponent on the same should be included in environmen­t impact assessment/ environmen­t management plan report in the form of tabular chart with financial budget for complying with the commitment­s made.” the TOR said.

EAC subsequent­ly changed its mind. HT reported on January 28 that the Mundra port waterfront developmen­t project was seeking an exemption from conducting a public hearing for its expansion -a move that sparked resistance from the fishing communitie­s in villages in and around Mundra -and on February 14 that EAC was going back on norms laid down by itself earlier and accepting the Adani Group’s plea for exemption from a public hearing.

“The central government takes a final decision on amending TOR or approval condition for such projects, including that of public hearing exemptions. In the present case too, the environmen­t ministry can review the

EAC’S recommenda­tion. Given the longstandi­ng history of conflicts and litigation in the area, it will be important that public hearing is conducted with full transparen­cy, ensuring informed and maximum participat­ion. The environmen­t ministry may consider appointing an oversight panel to ensure that this happens,” said Kanchi Kohli, legal researcher at the Centre for Policy Research.

Kamlesh Gadhvi, the sarpanch of Sadau group gram panchayat in Mundra, said: “We are drafting a letter to the EAC to inquire why our submission­s were not considered or referred to in the EAC minutes. The environmen­t ministry should consider our views before taking a final decision. They should also study satellite images to verify compliance with the terms of the environmen­tal clearance granted to the project.”

Around 30,000 families are engaged n fishing in Kutch many of whom are impacted by the SEZ project,according to Bharat Patel, general secretary of Machchimar Adhikar Sangharsh Sangathan, which represents the fishing community.

The issues raised by the fishing community include alleged loss of common grazing land due to the port project in Navinal gram panchayat, damage to fishermen’s boats and nets, pending conservati­on plan for creeks and mangroves and pending action plan for protection of fishermen’s livelihood­s.

A senior executive at Adani Group said the group had no comment to make on the matter.

 ?? REUTERS ?? ■
Mundra SEZ has raised concerns among fishing families.
REUTERS ■ Mundra SEZ has raised concerns among fishing families.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India