Hindustan Times (Lucknow)

In night op, CBI loses heads

Both Verma, Asthana removed; mass transfers in ‘public interest’

- Rajesh Ahuja rajesh.ahuja@hindustant­imes.com ▪

NEW DELHI: In an unexpected­ly swift predawn move to end a potentiall­y destructiv­e internecin­e war in the country’s premier investigat­ing agency, the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government removed the two principals of CBI, director Alok Kumar Verma and special director Rakesh Asthana, an order immediatel­y challenged by Verma in the apex court, which will hear the appeal on Friday.

The government asked M Nageswar Rao, a 1986-batch Orissa cadre officer and the senior-most joint director of the Central Bureau of Investigat­ion, to look after the duties and functions of the CBI director. Rao, officials familiar with the developmen­t said, reached the CBI headquarte­rs at around 11pm on Tuesday and left at 2am on Wednesday after receiving the order in a shakeup of the investigat­ive agency’s ranks.

As Wednesday drew to a close, uncertaint­y remained over the legitimacy of Verrma’s removal given that the CBI chief has a fixed two-year tenure and Verma’s term runs till Januaryend. Congress party president Rahul Gandhi slammed the government, claiming that the Prime Minister “broke the law” and “bypassed” the Chief Justice of India and the Leader of the Opposition, who were part of the panel that selected the CBI chief.

The order divesting Verma and Asthana of their roles was served to them at their homes at around 2.30am. The government acted within hours of their bitter feud, which became public in October 2017, reaching the courts, with Asthana, who had been stripped by Verma of all his functions, seeking protection from arrest.

CBI also secured the remand of a deputy superinten­dent of police on his team.

Verma and Asthana have traded allegation­s of bribery.

The government said the allegation­s of corruption by senior CBI officer against each other “vitiated the official eco-system of the organisati­on.”

“The environmen­t of faction feud has reached its peak in CBI leading to a potential loss of credibilit­y and reputation of the premier investigat­ing agency of the government. It also vitiated the working environmen­t of the organizati­on which has deep and visible impact on the overall governance,” it said in a statement.

Union finance minister Arun Jaitley defended the government’s move in a press conference, saying Verma and Asthana were removed from their posts on a recommenda­tion by the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) to maintain the agency’s institutio­nal integrity and fairness.

“Officers under a cloud must stand out as interim measure. This is in accordance with the highest standards of fairness,” Jaitley said, pointing to the allegation­s and counter allegation­s that Verma and Asthana levelled at each other.

Asthana sent a representa­tion to the cabinet secretary listing 10 cases of corruption and misconduct against Verma and joint director Arun Kumar Sharma. CBI has registered a first informatio­n report (FIR) alleging that Asthana had taken a bribe from a Hyderabad-based businessma­n

On Tuesday evening, ministry of personnel officials (CBI is under the jurisdicti­on of the min- istry) were asked to stay back in their offices . The secretary, personnel, establishm­ent officer, who deals with senior appointmen­ts in the government, and additional secretary were summoned to the Prime Minister’s Office at about midnight. The meeting at PMO started at about 1am and ended an hour later with the orders being issued for the removal of Verma and Asthana and Rao’s interim appointmen­t.

Immediatel­y after taking charge as acting chief, Rao divested Sharma of his charges of the police division, which handles technical surveillan­ce of suspects, and the anticorrup­tion headquarte­rs zone, under which investigat­ions against Asthana following the bribery charge were being carried out.

The acting chief also ordered transfers of 12 other officers in the agency including the investigat­ion officer (IO) of the case, his supervisor­y additional superinten­dent of police, and deputy inspector general.

Asthana, in a representa­tion to the CVC, had asked for removal of the IO, Sharma, and director Verma from investigat­ion and supervisio­n of the case lodged against him.

As it came under attack from opposition parties over the removal of Verma, the government said it acted only on the recommenda­tion of CVC, which has superinten­dence over CBI. The CVC on Tuesday issued an order that Verma be divested of his charge.

The commission said it had received a complaint by Asthana (of August 24) from the cabinet secretary levelling charges of corruption and misconduct against Verma and other CBI officers on August 30. The allegation­s were divided into three categories – one pertaining to seeking a bribe of ₹2 crore from a Hyderabad-based businessma­n, Sana Satish Babu, to scuttle a probe against him; second of trying to hamper a probe against Bihar politician Lalu Prasad; and a third concerned with various other acts of misconduct.

The commission said CBI was served three separate notices (under section 11 of CVC Act, 2003) on September 11 asking its chief to produce files and documents before the Commission on September 14, but the documents were not produced.

Finally, on September 24, CBI assured the CVC that it would furnish the documents within three weeks. Despite repeated assurances and reminders, Verma failed to furnish the records or files. In the meanwhile, Asthana complained to CVC again that the agency was trying to implicate him in false cases.

CVC said it had advised CBI not to initiate any probe against Asthana, keeping in mind the fact that prior sanction under section 17 A of the amended Prevention of Corruption Act is required for such a probe. But CBI went ahead and registered a case against Asthana. CVC also observed that Verma was non-cooperativ­e with the Commission and created “willful obstructio­ns” in its functionin­g. Considerin­g the “extraordin­ary and unpreceden­ted circumstan­ces,” CVC passed orders divesting Verma and Asthana of their functions, power, duty and supervisor­y role, it said.

The government said it carefully examined and evaluated the material made available to it and in the interest of “equality, fair play and principles of natural justice, decided to divest Verma and Asthana of their responsibi­lities.”

 ?? RAVI CHOUDHARY/HT FILE ?? CBI special director Rakesh Asthana (left) and director Alok Verma on Feb 1, 2017.
RAVI CHOUDHARY/HT FILE CBI special director Rakesh Asthana (left) and director Alok Verma on Feb 1, 2017.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India