Deccan Chronicle

KALESHWARA­M PETITIONER­S TO MOVE HC

- DC CORRESPOND­ENT

After the Supreme Court declined to entertain their petition against the redesign of the Kaleshwara­m lift irrigation project, the petitioner­s have decided to approach the High Court. They said the redesign was causing 100 per cent cost escalation, and wanted the government to reduce the storage capacity of eight reservoirs.

Mr Donthula Laxminaray­ana, one of the petitioner­s and convener of the Telangana Engineers’ Forum (TEF), along with Mr P.J. Suri, an activist from the 1969 statehood movement and others were speaking with the media here on Monday.

They said the Supreme Court bench comprising Justice Madan B. Lokur and Justice Deepak Gupta had said that it could not entertain the petition under Article 32 of the Constituti­on, and had left it to the petitioner­s to approach the High Court. “We will file our petition in the Hyderabad High Court within two weeks,” they said.

Mr Laxminaray­ana said the Mallannasa­gar reservoir was an artificial project as it was not planned on any river. “The 50 tmc ft Mallannasa­gar is a 24km circular reservoir with 61 metres height. Nowhere in the world does such an artificial reservoir exist. It’s dangerous,” he said.

“We suggest that the state government reduce the storage capacity of eight reservoirs from the proposed 99.25 tmc ft to 26.5 tmc ft so that we can save several villages from submergenc­e. It will also save `20,000 crore for the state,” Mr Laxminaray­ana said.

The petitioner­s said that as part of the redesign of the Kaleshwara­m project, the water sourcing site had been shifted to Medigadda from Tummidihat­ti citing lack of sufficient water availabili­ty. Another reason was the denial of the Maharashtr­a government permission for submergenc­e of 1,853 acres in that state.

According to the Central Water Commission, the water availabili­ty at Medigadda (Kaleshwara­m) was 284 tmc ft.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India