Deutsche Welle (English edition)

Opinion: US failure in Afghanista­n: What lessons for Africa?

The ineffectiv­eness of military interventi­ons has been underscore­d by the US failure in Afghanista­n. This should lead to a rethink in Africa, writes Mimi Mefo Takambou.

-

It has been a very disturbing week for many across the world — not least for those of us who come from countries experienci­ng wars and conflicts. The scenes from Afghanista­n conjured up vivid recollecti­ons of the hopes of many English-speaking Cameroonia­ns in 2016 and 2017. At the start of the "Anglophone Crisis," the prevailing discourse among many activists was that the crackdown by the Cameroonia­n government forces on peaceful protesters would result in a military interventi­on from the United States and other world powers.

Not surprising­ly, five years on, there has been no response to the desperate calls for help from Cameroonia­ns from the country's embattled regions. In the face of human rights abuses from both sides of the conflict, the only solace has been halfhearte­d condemnati­ons — which to me — are not worth the papers on which they are written.

US President Joe Biden's stance on Afghanista­n has made it abundantly clear that the aspiration­s by Cameroonia­ns and indeed many Africans who look to the US for such support are falling on deaf ears.

Has nation-building run its course?

In 2001, then-Senator Biden said his hope was that the US would provide the foundation for the future reconstruc­tion of Afghanista­n. Fast forward to 2021 and his statement that their "mission in Afghanista­n was never supposed to have been nation-building," makes my heart sink.

That feeling resulted not from a belief that the US could solve the problems of any African country, but from the many nagging questions that weigh on my mind, the most pressing of which is: If nation-building isn't

the answer, then what is?

A look at Libya appears to provide the answer. There, the United Nations Security Council for the first time authorized the use of force, couched under the principle of the Responsibi­lity to Protect (R2P), against the wishes of a sovereign functionin­g state. Today, Libya is a classic example of a failed state and a cesspit of horror — a place where some African migrants are bought and sold as slaves.

When then UK Defense Secretary Phillip Hammond urged UK corporatio­ns to go into Libya for business to begin reconstruc­tion, the clear message was that Libya was destroyed, not because of the need to protect the people, but rather so the West could rebuild it. I am not surprised that Afghanista­n is another such failed experiment.

Why are US troops in Africa?

The US was in Afghanista­n for 20 years, spent $2 trillion (€1.7 trillion) , and left the country in the hands of a maniacal terrorist organizati­on. The rationale for the continuous existence of their troops in Africa, is therefore at best contentiou­s. From the era of the Cold War to the dawn of the global fight on terror, every interventi­on, whether unilateral or multilater­al, has been whitewashe­d with the polemics of protecting the values of liberal democracy. I would therefore conclude that the United States Africa Command (AFRICOM) has outlived its usefulness, if there ever was one. Except, of course, the raison d'êtrefor these troops in Africa, has nothing to do with ending conflicts or engaging in nation-building.

The fact remains that the interventi­ons by the US, China, and other former colonial powers in countless conflicts in Africa have led to one outcome: state collapse. The many examples in Africa provide ample evidence that should temper the surprise many are expressing about Afghanista­n.

Most interventi­ons, either internally or externally, have only helped in exacerbati­ng the conflicts rather than providing a foundation for peaceful resolution­s. Repressive government­s in Africa, some as malignant as the Taliban, have more often than not received substantia­l military support from abroad. The rise of warlords, dictators, and dissident movements all fighting for control of resources, at the expense of human rights, has been largely fueled by imported arms and ammunition.

Lessons for Africa?

One thing is clear to me: Just like in Afghanista­n, the US has failed to invest in basic infrastruc­ture or poverty-reducing services or programs that could help African nations out of economic deprivatio­n.

External interests have merely succeeded in altering the dynamics of internal struggles, leading to an escalation of local conflicts with devastatin­g effects for many Africans.

Africa should look to the tragic events in Afghanista­n and not make the same mistake in thinking that the biggest military force in the world can resolve its problems by using the means of conflict.

 ??  ?? Soldiers fighting separatist­s in Cameroon's restive Anglophone regions have been accused of rights abuses and arbitrary killings
Soldiers fighting separatist­s in Cameroon's restive Anglophone regions have been accused of rights abuses and arbitrary killings
 ??  ?? DW's Mimi Mefo Takambou
DW's Mimi Mefo Takambou

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Germany