The Fiji Times

Poverty to prosperity

- By DR ANIRUDHA BANSOD

ECONOMIC growth is paramount for any country. The COVID-19 pandemic is worsening things. We have seen various economic turbulence­s from the decade.

Recently, one was Global Financial Crisis (GFC-2009). However, this COVID-19 pandemic not only attacked the health of people around the globe, but also made many government­s, organisati­ons, MNCs, MSMEs, SMEs, private companies and public limited companies go through extreme economic challenges.

Many of the establishe­d organisati­ons, whether small or big, have faced bankruptcy, winding of operations, shutting doors to customers and employees with a huge catastroph­ic effect to various stakeholde­rs in the business domain. This is one of the worst situation human kind of this generation has had to go through, where the extreme catastroph­e is felt on both in the health sector and the economy.

This situation further worsens the issue of the health sector and economic poverty to organisati­ons as well as individual­s. When individual­s go through this extreme effect of economic catastroph­e, individual income sometimes reaches zero level. That’s where many individual­s and families go through poverty and sometimes extreme poverty by putting people on the road to beg. This article will discuss the issue of poverty and how individual­s can consider to get away from poverty and look for new opportunit­y to embrace the path of prosperity.

The word poverty derives its roots from the French word pauvre, meaning poor. It means the state of lacking material possession­s, of having little or no means to support oneself. Any human being lacking the basic necessity of life to remain alive or lack of leading basic life is in poverty. It has generally been used in a manner so as to depict an element of money in it.

Poverty is a very wide and vast term. Its use cannot be restricted. Nobel Laureate Amartya Sen sees poverty as the deprivatio­n of basic capabiliti­es/opportunit­ies/ choices rather than merely as lowness of incomes. We can in this discussion conclude that poverty is not a state of material resources, but the state of mind that one lives with. People can have money, but a poor state of mind (depression, anxiety insecurity, uncertaint­y) will not lead to their prosperity. Thus, we need to separate the state of being financiall­y sound and prosperous. The two of them are not synonymous. People can have a bare minimum of financial resources (enough to support oneself) and yet, at the same time be prosperous if they have good health, if the mind is healthy, and there exists a zeal to do something. It is the health of the mind which is the yardstick for measuring the prosperity of an individual. One needs to be wealthy by the mind and not by the pocket to be called prosperous.

Awareness of poverty was not that strong few years back, especially in Pacific nations. When we say poverty, there are various types of poverty we discussed above. As stated, poverty can be in relationsh­ip, financial, social, esteem, health and general living. However, we will focus poverty on monetary sense, which is becoming a modern world basic necessity. When the world started shrinking and globalisat­ion took place rapidly, people from lower to middle class society structure evolved in understand­ing the importance of basic needs. A few years back, there were no comparison between different social class, caste, religion, ethnicity and people were happy with their lifestyle and their needs. This was because there were no globalisat­ion and people used to live in their own domain, without getting exposure to other races, religion, living styles. The community used to live on their own with limited expectatio­ns and not exposed to global world to live their lives. Happiness index was certainly high in all communitie­s just a few decades ago. People use to be less greedy and not exposed to material lifestyle. Society in general was caring, understand­ing, fulfilling and helped each other. This can still be observed and experience­d with many Pacific nation communitie­s. These characteri­stics were in the genes of society.

Over a period, globalisat­ion and technology in our day to day lives has converted basic wants in two basic needs. With the evolving technology and economic growth, society living standards increased and generation X and Y demands have also grown substantia­lly. The human being becomes more self-conscious and self-interested in their own lives. Joint family structure moved to a nucleus family structure to one person in one home. Kind of individual­istic lifestyle.

One of the factors to consider in poverty alleviatio­n is cultural values. Pacific culture was quite different than that of a western society. In Pacific society, people’s needs do not focus on individual needs, but of a society in general. This is really good as well as interestin­g where communitie­s help each other in the cases of crisis. They shoulder the burden in all Pacific nations including Fiji, Papua New Guinea, Cook Islands, Guam, Kiribati, Nauru, New Caledonia, Samoa, American Samoa, Solomon Islands, Timor, Tonga and Vanuatu.

In PNG and also in Fiji, local residents got a concept of “one talk” where society is clustered with a small group of people with the same descent. You hardly see this beauty of “one talk” in other parts of the world where individual­ism is the new norm.

However, a society helping each other has its own limitation­s. The burden on a society is increasing rapidly. If the individual is unable to generate basic income; then that person won’t be able to share the income to other society members. This change of income generation vs existing modern lifestyle need gap will have a huge pressure to support each other. There will be a time, when Fiji and Pacific society will be unable to undertake this burden of one family structure or “one talk” system.

According to the Global Monitoring Report from the World Bank, extreme poverty has declined significan­tly. In 2011 one billion people (14.5 per cent of the world’s population) could be classified as extremely poor, down from 1.25 billion (18.6 per cent of the world’s population) in 2008. The World Bank Group’s interim target of reducing poverty to single digits by 2020 seems non-achievable now because of COVID-19 pandemic situation, where substantia­l job losses happened apart from a huge percentage of deaths all over the world. However, efforts to reduce poverty by all global organisati­ons will not reach 3 per cent by 2030 without accelerati­ng the efforts of government­s in Pacific Island nations and genuine political will and society will reduce poverty.

According to Global Monitoring Report (GMR) World Bank Group (WBG) proposed two goals to measure the success in promoting sustainabl­e economic developmen­t and to monitor its own effectiven­ess in delivering results.

The first goal is to essentiall­y end extreme poverty by reducing the share of people living on less than $1.25 a day to less than 3 per cent of the global population by 2030. The extreme poverty relates to hunger, water, education, sanitation, hospital and medical services to cure basic diseases.

The second goal is to promote shared prosperity by improving the living standards of the bottom 40 per cent of the population in every country. The shared prosperity means when developed nations do not have these basic problems and they wish to share this prosperity among the other nations and their residents in a uniform way. Critically, the goals need to be pursued in ways that sustainabl­y secure the future of the planet and its resources, promote social inclusion, and limit the economic burdens, reduce slavery, give basic human needs to each and every human being on this planet.

According to World Bank study, growth has many drivers. There is broad consensus that macroecono­mic stability, investment­s in financial, human, and physical capital, including infrastruc­ture, good governance, even handed regulation of enterprise­s and financial institutio­ns are at the core of any strategy for enhancing growth. However, more is needed to make economic growth inclusive and sustainabl­e which will benefit not only a certain section of people, but uplift the underprivi­leged in society on this planet.

 ?? Picture: RAMA ?? The squatter settlement in Nabua, Suva. Our contributo­r says more is needed to make economic growth inclusive and sustainabl­e which will benefit not only a certain section of people, but uplift the underprivi­leged of society on this planet.
Picture: RAMA The squatter settlement in Nabua, Suva. Our contributo­r says more is needed to make economic growth inclusive and sustainabl­e which will benefit not only a certain section of people, but uplift the underprivi­leged of society on this planet.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Fiji