Waterloo Region Record

Three Identical Strangers,

- JUSTIN CHANG

The intensely compelling documentar­y “Three Identical Strangers” begins by reconstruc­ting a fateful autumn day in 1980, when Robert Shafran, a 19-year-old freshman at Sullivan County College in upstate New York, walked onto campus for the first time and found himself warmly greeted by several people he didn’t know, all of them calling him “Eddy.” After much confusion and some quick detective work, Shafran soon found himself staring into a face identical to his own: Eddy was his long-lost brother Edward Galland, from whom he had been separated soon after birth.

The story made national headlines that grew only more startling. Seeing what appeared to be two versions of himself in a newspaper photo, a Queens College freshman named David Kellman, realized that he was the third brother. After 19 years apart, the bonds of blood reasserted themselves immediatel­y: Kellner’s aunt recalls that when the young men first met, they started wrestling on the floor like puppies. As they soon realized, the triplets — born July 12, 1961 — had been adopted by three families, none of whom had been told that their son was one of a matching set.

Identical triplets are rare to begin with, as unlikely as three long-lost siblings stumbling upon each other in a state as populous as New York. But if “Strangers” drops its biggest bombshell early, director Tim Wardle holds plenty more in reserve. The tricky, twisty structure of this documentar­y, a scientific and philosophi­cal inquiry by way of a detective story, suggests a joyous earthquake followed by a series of grim, unsettling aftershock­s dragging a trail of intense, contradict­ory emotions in its wake.

The story’s happier early moments were well documented, and some in the audience may recall how Shafran, Galland and Kellner — better known as Bob, Eddy and David — became a mid-’80s cause celebre. They rented an apartment together in Manhattan, made the tabloids’ party pages with their nightly exploits and eventually opened their own restaurant, Triplets. The movie replays their cameo in the 1985 Madonna vehicle “Desperatel­y Seeking Susan” and their crowdpleas­ing interviews with Phil Donahue and Tom Brokaw.

Much is made of the brothers’ shared physical, emotional and temperamen­tal attributes: the similariti­es in their gait and posture, their preference for Marlboro cigarettes. Above all, there is the nearly uniform quality of the boys’ gregarious charm, which would have made them ideal camera subjects even under less emotionall­y fraught circumstan­ces. One of the pleasures of “Three Identical Strangers” is that you soon fall in love with those goofy, toothy grins.

The brothers were presented to the public and indeed at times presented themselves as a striking argument for biological determinis­m, a victory for those who believe in the primacy of nature over nurture. But in wading into that debate, “Three Identical Strangers” reminds us that even the most galvanizin­g visual evidence can be deceiving. Through careful reiteratio­ns of footage and voiceover as well as sometimes sinister dramatic re-creations, the movie misdirects our attention at every turn — an appropriat­e strategy for a story that turns out to be rooted not in coincidenc­e but in conspiracy.

Those who wish to preserve the freshness of a first viewing should tread carefully over the next few paragraphs. The question that struck the Shafran, Galland and Kellman families — why were the boys not told about their brothers? — is gradually, ominously answered. The film traces the inquiry to the now-closed doors of Louise Wise Services, formerly a prominent adoption agency specializi­ng in finding families for Jewish orphans. Documents and interviews point to the existence of a mysterious study, undertaken in secret, that arranged for identical twins and triplets to be separated, adopted and scrutinize­d for years afterward. Working with the editor Michael Harte, Wardle whips the story along at breakneck speed, stoking our sympathy with the brothers’ mounting sense of outrage and betrayal.

A many-sided rumination on psychiatri­c ethics, mental health and different schools of parenting, “Three Identical Strangers” is effortless­ly riveting, if a bit too slick for its own good. There is something ingenious about the way Wardle uses repetition in a movie about identicali­ty, reframing the same footage through different prisms of meaning. But there is also something self-satisfied and too clever about all this narrative duplicity. It doesn’t seem to be building to a grand revelation so much as delaying and obscuring something that has been apparent all along.

The documentar­y hides its most haunting truths in plain sight, in Wardle’s extensive conversati­ons with Shafran and Kellman. (Galland died in 1995, and his absence is the film’s most striking structural element.)

The two are interviewe­d separately, a decision that gives the picture its distinctly melancholy undertow. It’s a privilege to see them in solitude and in togetherne­ss, individual­s bound by something as ordinary as kinship and as extraordin­ary as circumstan­ce, finding sorrow as well as joy in the realizatio­n that they are strangers no longer.

 ?? MONGREL MEDIA ?? A still from the documentar­y, “Three Identical Strangers.”
MONGREL MEDIA A still from the documentar­y, “Three Identical Strangers.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada