Why the Legion refuses to let the white poppy bloom
Insult to veterans? Backers say flower highlights war’s folly
More than five years after the white poppy campaign sparked a rancorous debate about how Canadians should reflect on Remembrance Day, the anti-war movement is still stinging from its ugly standoff with the Royal Canadian Legion.
Organizers behind the low-key campaign, which promotes peace and remembers civilian casualties of war, admit the Legion’s opposition has undermined the popularity of the white poppy — with only 1,200 of the pale, homemade flowers distributed last year in advance of Remembrance Day.
“Unfortunately, the Legion’s negativity — turning it into an either/or — has done a lot of damage in terms of discouraging people,” says author and peace activist Heather Menzies.
“In terms of message control, they have succeeded in communicating: ‘If you wear the white poppy, it means that you are not honouring the war dead.’”
A spokesperson for the Legion’s Dominion Command in Ottawa said the organization, which represents 275,000 veterans and distributes millions of red poppies every November, would not comment on the white poppy movement.
In the past, the Legion has called the white flowers — some with the word “peace” appearing in the centre — an insult to veterans and a possible copyright violation because the legion owns the trademark on the poppy.
In 2010, the Legion threatened to launch a lawsuit to stop the alternative poppy drive.
In February 2011, the advocacy group Canadian Voice of Women for Peace met with the Legion’s leadership to seek a compromise, but the veterans weren’t interested, Menzies says.
“I thought we had made some progress in shifting the paradigm on what would be the focus of Remembrance Day,” says Menzies, whose great uncle was the victim of a gas attack during the First World War, and whose father was wounded by shrapnel during the Second World War.
“That would mean honouring the dead but also lamenting war because it is so destructive ... I thought they heard us that day ... (But) they just kept reiterating, ‘We want to defend our brand,’ which is the red poppy.”
Since then, Canadian Voice of Women for Peace has quietly soldiered on with its campaign, even thought it hasn’t gained much momentum.
Lyn Adamson, the group’s co-chair, says wearing a white poppy is not meant to show disrespect toward veterans — it can help open a broader discussion about the true cost of war. That’s why she wears both types of poppies at this time of year.
“We do want to remember those who have given their lives by following the instructions of their country in sending them to war, but we also want to remember the civilian deaths,” she says.
“Let’s think critically about war, while respecting the veterans who lost their lives, and let’s use this opportunity of remembering to figure out how we can end war.”
While the history of the red poppy can be traced back to the Napoleonic Wars in the 19th century, it was first adopted as a symbol of remembrance in Canada in 1921, six years after Lt.-Col. John McCrae of Guelph, wrote about the blood-red flowers that grew over battlefields in his poem, “In Flanders Fields.”
The white poppy emerged as a symbol of peace in 1933, when the Women’s Co-operative Guild in Britain was searching for a way to show their members were against war and for nonviolence.
In Canada, the Legion’s enmity for the white poppy has been partially fuelled by the misconception that peace activists believe the red poppy represents a glorification of war, Menzies says.
“All of the people I know who wear the white poppy are extremely respectful of the message of the red poppy, which is an honouring of the people who sacrificed their lives in war so that there could be peace and freedom for other people,” she says.