Toronto Star

Home speculatio­n tax would harm, not help

- BOB AARON BOB AARON IS A TORONTO REAL ESTATE LAWYER AND A CONTRIBUTI­NG COLUMNIST FOR THE STAR. HE CAN BE REACHED AT BOB@AARON.CA OR ON TWITTER: @BOBAARON2

My award for the worst real estate idea of the year — possibly the decade — goes to Toronto city council for approving a motion to push for a provincial tax to stop home speculatio­n and home flipping.

Coun. Mike Colle introduced the motion and it was approved by a 21-4 vote at council last month.

The motion claims that “out-ofcontrol housing prices are fuelled by real estate speculator­s and home flippers (‘investors’) who are buying multiple properties other than their principal residence.”

Colle’s motion completely ignores record-low interest rates and demographi­cs, which are the prime factors driving market price increases.

With the record low rates, and more “real” buyers entering the market, the demand for real estate increases — investors or no investors.

Colle’s motion fails to make the necessary connection between the rise in home prices and the involvemen­t of investors in perhaps 25 per cent of the market.

The motion also does not consider the inevitable effect of a speculatio­n tax on the residentia­l real estate market.

Colle is a former economics teacher who was in his twenties when the Bill Davis government introduced a 50 per cent land speculatio­n tax on April 9, 1974.

In the motion’s preamble, Colle says that tax is credited with “slowing the extreme increase in property values.”

That’s a wild understate­ment. The Davis government’s land speculatio­n tax caused what was probably the worst market crash since the Great Depression of 1929.

I was a young lawyer when the “spec tax” was introduced, and I vividly recall that the housing market crashed overnight. I spent days fielding call after call from panicked buyer clients who wanted me to do anything at all to get them out of pending deals after the values of the properties had crashed. And numerous calls from worried sellers who wanted to make sure their deals closed as written.

Lawsuits between buyers and sellers dragged on for years and the tax turned out to be a bonanza for litigation lawyers. Figurative­ly, there was blood in the streets as homeowners saw their equity wiped out overnight.

A new provincial land speculatio­n tax would cause home prices to drop sharply as they did in 1974. It would also result in years of litigation, foreclosur­es, powers of sale and bankruptci­es as millions of Ontario homeowners would see their home equity wiped out. The damage to our society would be incalculab­le.

Government interventi­on in the real estate market rarely produces positive results. A sharp market crash followed the Ontario government’s introducti­on of the 15 per cent Non-Resident Speculatio­n Tax on April 21, 2017. Litigation in the wake of that crash is still ongoing.

In my own practice, a number of clients walked away from hundreds of thousands of dollars in deposits when they could not sell their existing homes for enough money to finance a signed purchase agreement for a second home. At the same time, their lenders cut back on the amount they were willing to advance in the face of a significan­t drop in market value.

My message to Premier Ford is this: please do not interfere in the Ontario real estate market. No good things would result from a new speculatio­n tax.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada