Toronto Star

TV series’ addiction to ’time-jumping’ is getting tedious,

Too many jumps in time leave TV viewers feeling more confused than clever

- STACIA L. BROWN THE WASHINGTON POST

Two hour-long action series debuted on network TV in 2001 — Alias on ABC and 24 on Fox — and both relied heavily on flashbacks and flash-forwards, otherwise known as in medias res storytelli­ng.

At the time, the device seemed novel, even groundbrea­king. Before these shows, keeping up the frenetic energy of a blockbuste­r action film over a 22-episode TV season might have seemed like a tough ask.

But both shows rose to the challenge and were rewarded with long series runs — Alias at five seasons and 24 at nine — setting a pesky in medias res precedent that persists 14 years later. Hit shows such as ABC’s How to Get Away With Murder and Quantico (both air in Canada on CTV) still lean on the time-jump model in each of their plot-twisting episodes. But these days, starting stories in the middle of things feels more tiresome than groundbrea­king, more lazy than ambitious.

Both seasons of How to Get Away With Murder begin by revealing a shocking homicide that viewers will need to watch several episodes to solve. Each episode alternates between the events of the murderous night in question and the weeks leading up to it. By jumping from the future to the past, we’re being asked to keep track of not only plot points in reverse, but also character developmen­t.

The first-year law students in Annalise Keating’s (Viola Davis) class are introduced to us as accomplice­s to a heinous crime. We watch them plot a coverup of their involvemen­t then, through a series of slowerpace­d flashbacks, they try to earn our empathy by being doe-eyed or lovably fratty or wisecracki­ng or type-A achievers.

It’s a risky tactic that doesn’t always pay off. We may grow to like the students, but the time-jump device leaves logical holes that are harder to fill. After a season and a half, I have grown to understand the students’ personalit­ies, but their devotion to Annalise, who increasing­ly leaves chaos and crime in her wake, is unclear.

Annalise’s personalit­y is also shortchang­ed because of the in medias res storytelli­ng. She’s a horribly damaged, possibly self-loathing person, some of whose childhood and college secrets we’ve come to know. But who is this woman?

The series seems to have begun at a time in her life when her perfectly coiffed grasp on career and home have suddenly unravelled; we’re introduced to her just weeks before a very long downward spiral. And even with all that’s been revealed in flashback, it’s still hard to understand why her two full-time employees are so loyal, why her students are doing so much of her work for her and what her ultimate goals are — for herself and for those who naively rely on her.

Quantico has a similar protagonis­t problem. Another ensemble-cast show built around a tough female lead, Quantico asks us to invest in FBI recruit Alex Parrish’s (Priyanka Chopra) fight to prove her innocence, after introducin­g us to her at the scene of a terrorist attack for which she’s the lead suspect. It’s fine to know up front that there’s been a bombing for which Alex will eventually be blamed.

But over the course of this series’ first seven episodes, we’ve been introduced to a large principal cast whose backstorie­s are all being underserve­d by the show’s time-jump- ing conceit. Each recruit’s story seems to exist only to provide them a chance to be shifty-eyed red herrings. We don’t really know anyone — least of all Alex, whose defining characteri­stics seem to be trying to unlock her deceased father’s secrets and falling in love with another FBI agent who’ll help her with that and with clearing her name.

And it’s hard to trust that we will get to know these characters since it’s clear that their backstorie­s are being developed only in ways that serve the flashback-flashforwa­rd device. Any character who has Middle Eastern ties, for instance, has had those ties revealed.

Knowing too much too soon is rarely a narrative asset. It works best in slow-burning mysteries that are painstakin­g about establishi­ng characters’ traits and motivation­s. The goal, then, is for the viewer to feel like she’s being let in on the sleuthing process. With How to Get Away With Murder and Quantico, I feel like I’m being tricked with smoke and mirrors, an outsider rather than an assistant. As a viewer, I always want to feel more clever than confused — and too many time-jumps make that needlessly difficult.

When in medias res is used simply to shore up shocks and thrills, it shortchang­es both plot and character, which in turn shortchang­es audiences. It would be great to see each of these series take more linear, chronologi­cal approaches next season.

It would give both the characters and viewers a little breathing room.

 ?? MITCHELL HAASETH/ABC ?? Students’ devotion to Viola Davis’s Annalise Keating, centre, in How To Get Away With Murder, is hard to understand after a season and a half.
MITCHELL HAASETH/ABC Students’ devotion to Viola Davis’s Annalise Keating, centre, in How To Get Away With Murder, is hard to understand after a season and a half.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada