Toronto Star

Ontario Needs Sound Energy Planning

- BY DON MACKINNON President Power Workers’ Union

Boosting renewable energy to create economic growth and establish a culture of conservati­on are centerpiec­es of Ontario’s long-term energy plan. While both options have a role to play, their benefits have been oversold to the detriment of consumers and Ontario’s proven energy advantages. Billions of dollars have been spent on: ratepayer subsidized long-term contracts for wind and solar developmen­ts that deliver electricit­y less than 30 percent of the time; new price volatile, greenhouse gas (GHG) emitting, import dependent natural gas plants to back up this intermitte­nt power; and, smart meters and time-of-use pricing to shift electricit­y usage to off-peak periods. Now Ontario’s electricit­y prices are on the way to being among the highest in North America. Unfortunat­ely, consumers still face billions of dollars in hidden costs for numerous ill-conceived plans like the compensati­on being paid for two cancelled, and then relocated, gas plants and the taxpayerfu­nded “Clean Energy Benefit”. According to the province’s Environmen­t Commission­er, even with the closure of Ontario’s coal stations, the switch to natural gas generation compromise­s Ontario’s ability to meet its GHG targets. It also increases Ontario’s dependency on imported natural gas, including environmen­tally questionab­le shale gas, which means higher GHG emissions. Experience indicates that consumers have to work very hard at changing their patterns of electricit­y usage for modest results. To make matters worse, there is no transparen­t methodolog­y or reporting procedures in place to effectivel­y validate conservati­on investment­s. Yet some conservati­on advocates want higher peak prices, three to five times the current differenti­al to incent consumers to conserve more. Results so far suggest these are not the best ways for Ontario to sustain and create jobs or enhance its global competitiv­eness. Ontario needs a sensible energy strategy that can deliver economic growth, sustainabl­e environmen­tal benefits, and energy security. The focus should be on leveraging Ontario’s energy advantages — an establishe­d and successful nuclear industry, vast biomass resources and valuable provincial­ly owned generation and transmissi­on assets. On a positive note, the province’s hydroelect­ric generation is being renewed and expanded. Ontario’s plan also calls for the refurbishm­ent of the province’s GHG emission-free nuclear fleet and constructi­on of two new nuclear reactors at Darlington.The latter investment­s are particular­ly important since nuclear energy provides about half of Ontario’s electricit­y and 3,000 megawatts of that will disappear in 2020 when the Pickering Nuclear Station goes off line. Historical­ly, Ontario’s hydroelect­ric and nuclear generation, which together provide over 70 percent of the province’s electricit­y, have formed the foundation for our province’s economic prosperity. They also provide one of the lowest-carbon electricit­y system footprints in the world.

Ontario hosts most of Canada’s $6 bil- lion plus a year nuclear industry, its 160 supply chain companies and its 60,000 high value jobs. New nuclear investment­s, including building two Enhanced CANDU (EC6) reactors at Darlington, could drive an estimated 40 percent growth in Canadian nuclear industry employment over the next five years. For over 50 years, CANDU reactors have helped avoid substantia­l GHG emissions in Canada. Since 1972, over 2.4 billion tonnes — that is 90 million tonnes per year, the equivalent to the emissions from 18 million cars — have been avoided. Carbon-neutral biomass from Ontario’s forests and farms represents another opportunit­y to create more jobs and economic growth while helping to further reduce GHG emissions. Converting Ontario’s coal stations to utilize this domestical­ly sourced renewable fuel along with natural gas would provide electricit­y for peak production and improve our energy security by reducing natural gas imports. Converting our existing coal stations is also much less costly than building new natural gas plants. Ontario needs sound energy planning that works for the benefit of all Ontarians — strategic planning that will produce a low-GHG, affordable, reliable and secure electricit­y supply mix to sustain our economy and our environmen­t.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada