Sinkholes force out families in Sechelt
Greg and Gerry Latham spent Friday morning scrambling to pack up family heirlooms as a series of sinkholes threatened to destroy their dream retirement home on the Sunshine Coast.
The Lathams are among 14 families in an upscale seaside neighbourhood in Sechelt facing an evacuation order and they said they didn’t know if they would be allowed to return.
“I’m standing in my beautiful home that has absolutely no furniture in it, looking out at the view, the eagles flying by,” Gerry Latham said through tears. “I’m just trying to figure out what to leave behind.”
Although the sinkhole risk was documented before most of the homes were built, the Lathams said they weren’t told about the problem before buying. The situation has sparked lawsuits from several residents.
Sinkholes throughout the Seawatch subdivision prompted the District of Sechelt to order the evacuation. The Lathams said they’ve been told RCMP were to begin enforcing the order at 1 p.m. Friday.
The homes, with views overlooking Sechelt Inlet, are similar to others in a nearby subdivision valued at more than $1 million, although the B.C. Assessment Authority values most of the buildings in the Seawatch subdivision at zero.
An engineering report issued to the district on Feb. 7 says future sinkholes or landslides within the subdivision could damage infrastructure or buildings, and injury or death are possible consequences.
A statement issued by the district says Concordia Seawatch Ltd. built and sold the subdivision, despite engineering reports as early as 2006 describing the development of sinkholes.
“The Seawatch subdivision was designed, built, marketed and sold by a private company. The District of Sechelt cannot accept the argument that when a private-sector venture falters, the cost should be borne by the Sechelt taxpayers,” the statement said. Concordia could not be reached for comment.
After buying the property in 2004, Concordia submitted a geotechnical report before development began, then gave letters of assurance signed by several engineers certifying proper construction of the roads, water and sewer lines, the district said.
It said Concordia’s geotechnical engineer issued a report in 2006 documenting sinkholes that had developed and setting out how the infrastructure should be designed.
The company was required to register a restrictive covenant against title to all of the subdivided lots, the district said.
“This means each property owner should have been aware of the geotechnical attributes of the land,” it said.
The first major sinkhole to appear after residents moved in was in June 2012. In February 2015, another large sinkhole damaged a home, forcing the owners to move out.
The Lathams said their street began deteriorating early last year, leading to a road closure. In September 2018, another sinkhole appeared on an undeveloped property. The most recent large sinkhole appeared on Christmas Day.
“There is a very high probability of at least one sinkhole collapse each year based on the recent history of the site,” an engineering report to the district says.
Several homeowners have launched lawsuits against the district, Concordia, its contractor, engineering firms, the home warranty provider and real estate agents. Some have been dropped, but two owners have ongoing litigation, the district said. A trial is set for March 23, 2020.
The district’s statement says the most comprehensive solution to the problem would involve drilling wells, continuous pumping to remove groundwater, partial infrastructure replacement and repairing roads. But it says that would cost $10 million based on a 2015 estimate and the district cannot afford it without a referendum to raise property taxes immediately by 8.5 per cent.
The provincial government will not offer assistance because the situation does not qualify under the emergency response program, the statement says.
Despite early reports about the sinkhole risk, the Lathams said it was never disclosed to them by real estate agents, the developer, the district or the lawyer who conducted a title search for them.
The couple said they can’t afford to enter the lawsuit, which has cost their neighbours $400,000 over four years.
The Lathams said they fear they have lost the $1 million plus $250,000 in improvements they sank into what they thought would be their retirement home.
“There’s been a lot of comments coming back to us saying: ‘Well, you should have done your due diligence, you should have known better.’ People who live on the Sunshine Coast, who have lived here their entire lives, say: ‘Well we could have told you that,’ ” Gerry Latham said.