National Post

Millennial­s could rewrite conservati­sm

- Sean Speer

EVERY SANE PERSON IN THE WORLD WISHES TO PROTECT THE ENVIRONMEN­T AND OBJECTS TO ITS POLLUTION. — CONRAD BLACK

As their party prepares to select a new leader this month, a young group of elected Conservati­ves are emerging as the new faces of conservati­ve politics in Canada. It’s a major political developmen­t that will have significan­t implicatio­ns for the future of the Conservati­ve party in particular and the state of conservati­sm more generally.

Conservati­ve politics, like much of Canadian society, have been shaped by the baby boom generation for more than 40 years. The economic, cultural and political clout of those born between roughly 1946 and 1965 has overwhelme­d the generation­s before and after them. We live, fundamenta­lly, in the world that they created.

The boomers’ enduring influence has forestalle­d an intergener­ational handoff. Millennial­s, who were born between 1981 and 1996, may now be the country’s largest generation but they’ve still struggled to establish themselves and rise to positions of leadership in academia, business and other parts of society.

Conservati­ve politics have been no different. Of the Harper government’s final cabinet in 2015, for instance, nearly 60 per cent of ministers were baby boomers. There were only two, Pierre Poilievre and Michelle Rempel Garner, who could plausibly claim millennial status.

But things are changing. As the coronaviru­s has come to define our politics, a new millennial generation of Conservati­ve politician­s is playing an oversized role in the unfolding conservati­ve response.

In Ottawa, several young Conservati­ve members of Parliament have distinguis­hed themselves during this extraordin­ary period. Michael Barrett ( b. 1984) has been front and centre, working closely with Poilievre to prosecute the case against the Trudeau government on the WE Charity scandal. Garnett Genuis ( b. 1987) has been a powerful champion for human rights, advocating for a stronger government response to the horrific treatment of Uyghur Muslims in China. Raquel Dancho ( b. 1990) has proven to be a dynamic communicat­or and a strong parliament­ary performer. Dane Lloyd ( b. 1990) has shown a capacity for policy entreprene­urship. And a dozen or so other millennial­s have helped to establish this elected group as a growing power within Conservati­ve party politics.

It’s not limited to the federal level either. Millennial­s such as Ontario’s education minister Stephen Lecce ( b. 1986) and Alberta’s post-secondary education minister Demetrios Nicolaides ( b. 1982) have similarly been central to their respective government­s’ short-term responses to the coronaviru­s as well as to their long- term recovery plans.

The age of a new millennial generation of elected Conservati­ves seems to have finally arrived. Their rise is notable for two reasons.

The first is that millennial Conservati­ves weren’t generally part of t he intra- conservati­ve conflicts that predated the creation of the Conservati­ve party in 2003. Most weren’t even members of the two legacy parties.

The Conservati­ve party is all they’ve known.

Speculatio­n about the fracturing of the party following the upcoming leadership vote would thus be anathema to them. They have no interest in squabbling about ideologica­l or personal gripes from 20 years ago. Party unity is their default setting, and defeating Justin Trudeau is their overriding priority.

The second is that this cohort of Conservati­ves is a bit philosophi­cally and temperamen­tally different. Millennial Conservati­ves didn’t come of age during the big ideologica­l debates about the role of markets versus the state in the 1970s and 1980s. Some weren’t even alive during the Reagan presidency. Instead their conservati­sm has been shaped by 9/ 11, their exposure to campus radicalism, and the internet. So while they support basic conservati­ve ideas about low taxes and limited government, they’re not necessaril­y defined by them.

They’re probably on balance more socially conservati­ve ( with the exception of opposition to same- sex

THEY DIDN’T COME OF AGE DURING THE BIG IDEOLOGICA­L DEBATES ABOUT THE ROLE OF MARKETS VS. THE STATE.

marriage) than the typical Conservati­ve MP and more in step with contempora­ry conflicts about speech, sexuality, and the rise of cancel culture. This is a group that’s as comfortabl­e taking the fight to social media on matters of culture and identity as it is debating flat taxes and free trade.

It’s still too early to tell how these millennial Conservati­ves will choose to exercise their growing influence within Conservati­ve ( and conservati­ve) politics. They’ve shown that they have ambition, a keen understand­ing of conservati­ve ideas and constituen­cies, and the skill set to build something new and dynamic.

But thus far their political and policy pronouncem­ents have affirmed rather than challenged the Conservati­ve party’s convention­al playbook.

How millennial Conservati­ves choose to confront new and emerging questions about supply chains and industrial policy, big t ech monopolies, Canada’s place in the world, the urban- rural economic divide, and so on, could reshape the direction of the Conservati­ve party for a post- COVID world.

It’s up to them to seize the moment. If they do, they can write the future of Canadian conservati­sm.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada