Aubameyang happy to give up Stoke hat-trick

PIERRE-EMERICK Aubameyang said he was happy to give up the chance to claim a hat-trick on Sunday, preferring to see Arsenal strike partner Alexandre Lacazette convert a confidence-boosting penalty

Arsenal defeated relegation-haunted Stoke 3-0 with Aubameyang scoring twice – a penalty and another from open play – with substitute Lacazette scoring the third, also from the spot a minute before time.

Aubameyang revealed he passed up the opportunity to score a maiden Arsenal hat-trick – he had scored two for Borussia Dortmund this season before his January transfer – because he wanted to help Lacazette. The Frenchman had returned from injury for his first game since February 10 and accepted the gift gratefully.

“I had scored twice already so I knew it would be good for his confidence,” Aubameyang explained.

Some managers do not allow anybody other than the designated penaltytaker to have a go from 12 yards but Arsenal boss Arsene Wenger made it clear he approved of the gesture.

“That shows the state of our society – that when people are generous they are surprised,” he said. “Even more when it is footballers – and when it is strikers even more. I wasn’t surprised because I know they have a good understanding. I like that because it can only make the team stronger. I think it’s great.”

The win did nothing to alter the Gunners’ position of sixth in the Premier League table, and they are now concentrating on the Europa League, with CSKA Moscow due at the Emirates Stadium on Thursday for a quarterfinal first-leg clash.

But Stoke boss Paul Lambert was left fuming with the penalty decision on the first goal.

A point would have been precious to second bottom Stoke and they were 15 minutes away from achieving just that when referee Craig Pawson awarded a penalty for Bruno Martins Indi’s challenge on Mesut Ozil.

Lambert was convinced the penalty should not have been given as Martin Indi, although approaching from a position behind Ozil, had got enough on the ball.

The Scot argued that the Video Assistant Referee system – not yet used in the Premier League – would have seen the original decision overturned had it been in operation.

“It was a game-changer because a couple of minutes earlier we had hit the post,” he said. “I know we have the benefit of replays and Craig doesn’t but for the big moments you have to be so precise.”