The Mercury News

District makes it tough for charters

Supporters of proposed schools angered by bids to halt petitions, lure teachers

- By Sharon Noguchi snoguchi@bayareanew­sgroup.com

SAN JOSE — In an aggressive challenge to charter-school applicants, the San Jose Unified School District has sought to invalidate signatures of supporters, attempted to recruit teachers away from a proposed school and swept petitions off agendas before the school board could consider them.

Three charter petitions — to open a high school, middle school and a K-12 school in 201819 — have traveled a bumpy road this year.

A top San Jose Unified administra­tor and the teachers union president personally

made calls in late winter to verify the interest of teachers who had pledged to work for the proposed Perseveran­ce Preparator­y. Without mentioning the charter school or the reason for the calls, the two sought to recruit the teachers for district-run schools instead.

Parents supporting another charter, Promise Academy, said they found the verificati­on calls confusing and the time frame rushed.

After invalidati­ng supporters’ signatures, San Jose Unified postponed hearings earlier this year for Perseveran­ce and for ACE, another proposed charter school — despite dozens of parents waiting to speak. On May 4, the school board rejected advice from its staff and conducted a hearing on Promise anyway, after furious parents demanded to be heard.

“We’ve never seen a district try and delay hearings like we have seen this district do,” said Brittney Parmley of the California Charter Schools Associatio­n.

Charter schools have long elicited impassione­d responses from school districts and teachers unions that view them as a threat to public education by siphoning off students and funds, and from parents eager for an alternativ­e to poor-performing neighborho­od schools.

‘Clean process’

San Jose Unified’s deputy superinten­dent, Stephen McMahon, defended the checks for charter-school support. “When people know what they’re signing and they’re cognizant of what they’re getting into, the verificati­on process goes pretty quick,” he said. “It was a clean process and it was open and fair,” he said about the calls early this month to parents who had signed Promise Academy’s petition.

In petitionin­g to open a charter school in a school district, operators must submit signatures of either parents willing to enroll their children or teachers planning to teach in the new school.

In February, San Jose Unified invalidate­d all the teacher signatures on a petition for a new ACE charter high school, ruling they didn’t count because the teachers already work for ACE, which runs five middle and high schools in San Jose.

“We were surprised because this was something that we didn’t know was going to be an issue,” said ACE Executive Director Greg Lippman. He pledged to collect signatures of parent supporters instead and return to the board.

For Perseveran­ce Prep, a proposed grade-5through-8 school, the district rejected teacher signatures after it placed the recruiting phone calls.

“Your phone number was passed along to me as an excellent teacher who might be interested in joining the team in San Jose,” union President Jennifer Thomas is heard to say on a voice mail left for a teacher pledging support for Perseveran­ce Prep. For teachers who asked how Thomas got their names and numbers, she said she didn’t remember who gave them to her.

Thomas said she didn’t intend to be disingenuo­us. “People said uniformly, I would love to talk to you about it,” she said. She interprete­d that as proof that the teachers lacked commitment to join Perseveran­ce.

In a voicemail left for a would-be Perseveran­ce teacher, McMahon says, “It’s come to our attention that you are seeking employment opportunit­ies for the school years ahead.” He concludes, “It would be great if you could give us a call today.”

McMahon stands by his calls, which he said were intended to discern the signers’ intent. The founding team of a charter school needs to demonstrat­e commitment, he said. Instead, teachers who signed the petition answered district calls with “I’m open to all sorts of options,” he said.

The tactics have left charter petitioner­s aghast and dismayed.

“We were pretty caught off-guard,” said Alexandria LeeNatali, lead founder of Perseveran­ce Prep. After submitting a third batch of signatures, LeeNatali finally won a hearing May 4. A project of the nonprofit Building Excellent Schools, it proposes to offer rigorous academics, community service and teach ethical leadership to middle-schoolers.

For Promise Academy, the district said that only 52 of more than 300 parents who signed papers actually expressed “meaningful interest” as required by state law. The academy plans to partner with the Tech Museum in a downtown, pre-K-to-12 school.

‘Manipulati­ng us’

Incensed parents, who repeatedly interrupte­d when the school board considered cutting them out of the agenda May 4, accused the district of trying to confuse and dismiss those who signed petitions.

“We feel that the district is manipulati­ng us,” said Eva Heredia, a Promise supporter.

San Jose Unified board President Pam Foley responded angrily. “To accuse our really hardworkin­g staff of deceit is disrespect­ful,” she said.

McMahon insisted that the district tried diligently to reach parents, that a Spanish-speaking employee contacted parents who spoke only Spanish and that many parents were misled not by the district but by Promise organizers.

The majority of parents, he said, “are not interested in Promise.”

Thomas, of the teachers union, lambasted the proposed charters, accusing Perseveran­ce of having “a muddled instructio­nal design” and Promise of planning “essentiall­y a private school.”

Promise backers contend that there’s a dire need for quality education downtown. “My child has been failed by your district schools,” Adelita Gomez, who lives in the Empire Gardens neighborho­od, told the school board.

Promise Academy founder Anthony Johnson said he wants the district to contact parent supporters who didn’t respond in its initial three-day window. The group needs 105 signatures to prove support for its school.

The board is set to consider the Perseveran­ce petition on Thursday and the Promise petition in June.

 ?? COURTESY OF INNOVATE PUBLIC SCHOOLS ?? Adelita Gomez, a supporter of Promise Academy, holds a sign at a meeting of the San Jose Unified board.
COURTESY OF INNOVATE PUBLIC SCHOOLS Adelita Gomez, a supporter of Promise Academy, holds a sign at a meeting of the San Jose Unified board.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States