Windsor Star

Scotland voted ‘No’ — now what?

Cameron faces wrath of party, opposition

- SYLVIA HUI The Associated Press

LONDON — British Prime Minister David Cameron sought Monday to limit the divisive political fallout following the Scottish referendum, gathering senior Conservati­ves at his official country retreat to placate anger over promises made to Scotland to keep it in the United Kingdom.

Britain’s politician­s now have the headache of mapping out how to implement the new powers pledged to Scotland and how that impacts the rest of the realm — England, Wales and Northern Ireland.

Here is a guide to the issues being discussed.

WHAT IS THE ‘ENGLISH QUESTION?’

Cameron’s main problem is anger over the “English question,” or the “English votes for English laws” issue. That refers to the question of whether Scottish lawmakers elected to the House of Commons can continue to vote on policies that only affect England — a long-standing grievance in the U.K.’s system.

The Cameron-led Conservati­ve Party is upset that its leader, together with the two main opposition parties, promised to allow the Scottish Parliament to decide on their own tax, spending and welfare issues in a last-minute attempt to encourage voters to reject independen­ce.

The Tories argue that if Scots get that package, then other parts of the U.K. should also be granted similar powers.

Conservati­ve John Redwood said that some party members feel that “we too need our own devolved government to balance the kingdom.”

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR SCOTLAND?

Cameron has drawn an acrimoni- ous backlash for suggesting that handing power to the Scots should take place “in tandem” with a decision on constituti­onal reforms in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.

Liberal Democrat Cabinet minister Danny Alexander called Cameron’s position “deeply frustratin­g.”

Cameron’s office has since stressed that it will honour the promise made last week.

But there is no consensus among the parties on the way forward.

That doesn’t bode well for Scotland, which was promised legislatio­n setting out the transfer of powers by mid-2015.

Many observers say that is an impossible timeline because there is simply no quick fix to constituti­onal changes that affect the whole of the U.K.

WHO LOSES?

Alex Salmond, the Scottish independen­ce leader, has said Scottish voters are angry and hurt by the political fallout, and claimed they have been “tricked” into voting to stay in the union.

Cameron is now in a bind to calm the rebellion within his own ranks and has to convince the public he hasn’t backtracke­d on a promise.

But the opposition Labour Party, which is seeking a return to power in next year’s general election, stands to lose the most in the fallout. The party, which has 41 of Scotland’s 59 lawmakers, will suffer from any measures to restrict Scottish voting rights. Opposition leader Ed Miliband refused to back or reject Cameron’s stance, only saying he would be open to the idea of greater scrutiny by English lawmakers.

 ?? LEFTERIS PITARAKIS/The Associated Press ?? British Prime Minister David Cameron faces a rebellion within his own ranks as he tries to stand up to his promises to the Scottish people to allow the Scot
tish Parliament to decide on their own issues.
LEFTERIS PITARAKIS/The Associated Press British Prime Minister David Cameron faces a rebellion within his own ranks as he tries to stand up to his promises to the Scottish people to allow the Scot tish Parliament to decide on their own issues.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada